Saturday, November 3, 2012

THE DAY OF RECKONING FOR AMERICA



In a few days Americans will reveal whether we embrace American values of freedom, free enterprise, constitutional fealty, federalism and courage under fire.

Our patriotism will either rise again or continue to be transformed by elitists seeking to devolve our history and diminish our spirits. This election may not be the last but it will be the first response to an ideological siege upon our values as a nation.

When we fought a revolution against the enslavement of King George III not all the colonists supported the war for our independence. Some remained loyal to their king, some believed the war to be both futile and suicidal and still some others wanted to continue to negotiate with England believing in a pacifist’s solution but we are not descendents from these weak kneed stock.

We are seeing a divided country as we were prior to the Civil War but instead of it being a north versus south dividing line of states over slavery the division is more red state versus blue state over socialism that would enslave us all.

Why are we Americans even having this debate? How can a country with a storied history of valiant bravery to gain our freedom that then fought to ensure all Americans be equally blessed with that freedom want to now hand it over to elitist bureaucrats?

The answer is socialists’ insurgency. Insurgency in our educational system from kindergarten to university, insurgency from pew to pulpit, insurgency from business to lobbyists, insurgency from unions to campaign funds, insurgency from progressives in both political Parties and insurgency that has invaded the last bastion of patriotism; American family values.

Americans have always been reasonable caring and common sensible citizens that want fairness to be applied for everyone yet even that has been corrupted by the myth of Statists claiming equality equals fairness.

Fairness is not always equal but equal is never fair to a diverse world of uniqueness.

Below is a quick lesson on myth versus fact about equality being the same as fairness.

A mother of two twin boys aged 10 named Peter and Paul Smith admonishes the boys not to cut thorough the neighbor’s yard on route to school. The neighbor has complained and the mother warns that they will be punished if they disobey.
Paul likes to read and build model airplanes in his room after school whereas Peter is less studious hates being cooped up in his room and loves to be outside playing games with friends.

They follow their mother’s rules to not trespass until one day they are very late for school. Peter presses Paul that if they don’t cut through the neighbor’s yard they will be late for school. Paul hesitates but Peter convinces him that the neighbor’s car isn’t in the driveway so with none home and no one will know. They ran through the yard unknowing that the neighbor was in fact home and promptly called their mother.

Version I punishment under equality;

When Peter and Paul arrived home from school they were met with a very angry mother that sentenced both boys to what she called equal punishment. Both boys were confined to their respective rooms after school for a period of one week to come out only for dinner.

Both Peter and Paul accepted that they both equally violated mother’s rule. However, Peter felt he was being punished unfairly because only he not his brother was being punished. Peter knew as did Paul that Paul was normally in his room after school and so it was not a deprivation whatsoever.

Importantly instead of teaching both boys the lesson of negative consequences to their choice to defy the rules the equal punishment wrought a very different outcome.

Paul who suffered no ill from disobeying had less fear to stretch the rules in the future if the worst he could be harmed would be room banishment.

Peter who suffered the denial of being outside cavorting with his friends felt persecuted unfairly not rightfully punished. Peter held jealous anger toward his brother Paul and insecurity over his mother’s favoring of his brother.
Worse than this Peter’s persecution perception now negated the punishment lesson by causing him to believe it mattered little whether he chose right over wrong as he felt disfavored. He might as well indulge his whimsy and be a rule breaker because nobody cares about him.

Version II punishment under fairness;

When Peter and Paul arrived home from school they were met with a very angry mother that sentenced both boys to what she called fair punishment. She banished Peter to his room after school for a week only to come out for dinner. She banished Paul from his room for a week only to be allowed to return to it at night to sleep.

Both Peter and Paul accepted that they disobeyed mother’s rule and deserved to be punished. Both boys hated their punishment and would love to trade places yet both boys knew they were being treated fairly by their mother. Both boys learned that if they wanted to avoid this punishment in the future they needed to think about the consequences of their actions and make better choices.  

Even our creator did not distribute equality to our likeness, abilities, and characteristics as individuals. We were only given equally life and the free will to exercise that life either for good or unwholesome purpose.

“All men are created equal” has been corrupted by implying it means there are and or should be no differences among individuals. Yet the real meaning refers instead to humanity’s view on the sanctity of all human life being equally respected. What you then pursue, dream, hope, aspire and rise to as an individual is between your conscience and your creator not under the control or thumb of human dictates.

Pluralism was the construct of our forefathers to ensure a level playing field of fairness in an acknowledgement of unequal designs of humans by making the law be equally applicable to all under it. Those laws had to have the support of the people to be both created and abolished but no American would be allowed to be above the law.

Adjudication and punishment of violating the law was also viewed as propriety of exacting fairness commensurate with the level of lawbreaking (murder) the circumstances of the lawbreaking (self-defense) and the judgment of jurists and jury to a fair penalty.

Statist in this country have preached socialism in the pulpit (social justice) have taught socialism in the classroom, demand socialism in the workplace (unionization) while corporate America gives an equal corrupted dollar to both political parties to advance socialist elitism. 

The insurgency started in the Democratic Party that has been shrill shill of socialist’s agitators for half a century but Americans know that the Republican Party has a number of insurgents in their ranks as well.
Parties are corrupt, both parties seek to power grab from the people but there is a major difference that has been brewing as the counter insurgency in the American politic. Do you know what that is? Have you heard of them?

Yes the Tea Party Movement, the concerned citizens, the libertarians, the awakened voters, the patriotic activists, the independents and yes the traditional American that still salutes the flag in honor for which she stands.

We the great unwashed electorate that wonders how it is after each election nothing changes and instead grows worse in corruption and disseverment of our hard fought freedoms. 

Well to all those undecided voters, cynical voters and fooled voters by leftist ideology this is the time to decide which side you are on. This is the time to step off the sideline. This is the time to vote with a whole different mindset. Hire them and fire them but don’t admire them!

Patriotic Americans are committed to work through the Republican Party that still holds hope to be infused with constitutional faithful, constituent faithful, American value faithful, free enterprise faithful and honor in office faithful politicians.

We are not delusional, dumb, trusting, and hypocritical or expecting that those we elect will honor their words of promise rather we will be vigilant as their boss to keep them to task.

Since 2010 and well into the future elections past 2012 and into 2014, 2016 and so on the new American electorate will push back the corrupt insurgents against our Constitutional Republic. 

Obama and the Democrats have tried to divide us, make us cynically believe their equality drivel and have numbed down our minds, hearts and loyalties to our fellow Americans.

Government isn’t charitable, Americans are, government isn’t inventive Americans are, government isn’t efficient Americans are, government isn’t successful Americans are and government did not build our nation Americans did! Americans don’t leave Americans behind our government did that! 

You must vote Romney and Ryan along with voting for Republicans in the House and Senate for it is our only chance to start the peaceful counter revolution to the statist’s socialists that have completely infiltrated the Democratic Party.

If John F. Kennedy were alive today he would vote for Romney and Ryan for he would not recognize his own party that lacks “Profiles in Courage”.

Saturday, October 20, 2012

STYX, LIES, AND VIDEO TAPE

The President has made a number of statements about Benghazi as follows by the Washington post.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/from-video-to-terrorist-attack-a-definitive-timeline-of-administration-statements-on-the-libya-attack/2012/09/26/86105782-0826-11e2-afff-d6c7f20a83bf_blog.html


“The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. We're working with the government of Libya to secure our diplomats. I've also directed my administration to increase our security at diplomatic posts around the world. And make no mistake, we will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people.


“Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts…No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.”

— President Obama, Rose Garden statement, Sept. 12


OBAMA: “What we’ve seen over the last week, week and a half, is something that actually we've seen in the past, where there is an offensive video or cartoon directed at the prophet Muhammad. And this is obviously something that then is used as an excuse by some to carry out inexcusable violent acts directed at Westerners or Americans.

“And my number-one priority is always to keep our diplomats safe and to keep our embassies safe. And so when the initial events happened in Cairo and all across the region, we worked with Secretary Clinton to redouble our security and to send a message to the leaders of these countries, essentially saying, although we had nothing to do with the video, we find it offensive, it's not representative of America's views, how we treat each other with respect when it comes to their religious beliefs, but we will not tolerate violence.”

QUESTION: “We have reports that the White House said today that the attacks in Libya were a terrorist attack. Do you have information indicating that it was Iran, or al-Qaeda was behind organizing the protests?”

OBAMA: “Well, we're still doing an investigation, and there are going to be different circumstances in different countries. And so I don’t want to speak to something until we have all the information. What we do know is that the natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests.”

— President Obama, Univision Town Hall, Sept. 20

QUESTION: “I heard Hillary Clinton say it was an act of terrorism. Is it? What do you say?”

OBAMA: “We are still doing an investigation. There is no doubt that the kind of weapons that were used, the ongoing assault, that it wasn’t just a mob action. Now, we don’t have all the information yet so we are still gathering.”

“That is what we saw play out in the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world. Now, I have made it clear that the United States government had nothing to do with this video, and I believe its message must be rejected by all who respect our common humanity.”

— Obama, speech to the U.N. General Assembly, Sept. 25


This is what the President said at the town Hall debate on Tuesday October16th per the transcripts.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/2012-presidential-debate-full-transcript-oct-16/story?id=17493848&page=8



QUESTION: We were sitting around, talking about Libya, and we were reading and became aware of reports that the State Department refused extra security for our embassy in Benghazi, Libya, prior to the attacks that killed four Americans.

Who was it that denied enhanced security and why?


OBAMA: Well, let me first of all talk about our diplomats, because they serve all around the world and do an incredible job in a very dangerous situation. And these aren't just representatives of the United States, they are my representatives. I send them there, oftentimes into harm's way. I know these folks and I know their families. So nobody is more concerned about their safety and security than I am.
So as soon as we found out that the Benghazi consulate was being overrun, I was on the phone with my national security team and I gave them three instructions.

Number one, beef up our security and procedures, not just in Libya, but at every embassy and consulate in the region.
Number two, investigate exactly what happened, regardless of where the facts lead us, to make sure folks are held accountable and it doesn't happen again.

And number three, we are going to find out who did this and we're going to hunt them down, because one of the things that I've said throughout my presidency is when folks mess with Americans, we go after them.

OBAMA: Now Governor Romney had a very different response. While we were still dealing with our diplomats being threatened, Governor Romney put out a press release, trying to make political points, and that's not how a commander in chief operates. You don't turn national security into a political issue. Certainly not right when it's happening. And people -- not everybody agrees with some of the decisions I've made. But when it comes to our national security, I mean what I say. I said I'd end the war in Libya -- in -- in Iraq, and I did.

I said that we'd go after al-Qaeda and bin Laden, we have. I said we'd transition out of Afghanistan, and start making sure that Afghans are responsible for their own security, that's what I'm doing. And when it comes to this issue, when I say that we are going to find out exactly what happened, everybody will be held accountable. And I am ultimately responsible for what's taking place there because these are my folks, and I'm the one who has to greet those coffins when they come home. You know that I mean what I say.

CROWLEY: Because we're -- we're closing in, I want to still get a lot of people in. I want to ask you something, Mr. President, and then have the governor just quickly.

Your secretary of state, as I'm sure you know, has said that she takes full responsibility for the attack on the diplomatic mission in Benghazi. Does the buck stop with your secretary of state as far as what went on here?

OBAMA: Secretary Clinton has done an extraordinary job. But she works for me. I'm the president and I'm always responsible, and that's why nobody's more interested in finding out exactly what happened than I do.

The day after the attack, governor, I stood in the Rose Garden and I told the American people in the world that we are going to find out exactly what happened. That this was an act of terror and I also said that we're going to hunt down those who committed this crime. 

And then a few days later, I was there greeting the caskets coming into Andrews Air Force Base and grieving with the families.

And the suggestion that anybody in my team, whether the Secretary of State, our U.N. Ambassador, anybody on my team would play politics or mislead when we've lost four of our own, governor, is offensive. That's not what we do. That's not what I do as president, that's not what I do as Commander in Chief.


CROWLEY: Governor, if you want to...

ROMNEY: Yes, I -- I...

CROWLEY: ... quickly to this please.

ROMNEY: I -- I think interesting the president just said something which -- which is that on the day after the attack he went into the Rose Garden and said that this was an act of terror.

OBAMA: That's what I said.

ROMNEY: You said in the Rose Garden the day after the attack, it was an act of terror. It was not a spontaneous demonstration, is that what you're saying?

OBAMA: Please proceed governor.

ROMNEY: I want to make sure we get that for the record because it took the

president 14 days before he called the attack in Benghazi an act of terror.

OBAMA: Get the transcript.

CROWLEY: It -- it -- it -- he did in fact, sir. So let me -- let me call it an act of terror...

OBAMA: Can you say that a little louder, Candy?

CROWLEY: He -- he did call it an act of terror. It did as well take -- it did as well take two weeks or so for the whole idea there being a riot out there about this tape to come out. You are correct about that.

ROMNEY: This -- the administration -- the administration indicated this was a reaction to a video and was a spontaneous reaction.

CROWLEY: It did.

ROMNEY: It took them a long time to say this was a terrorist act by a terrorist group. And to suggest -- am I incorrect in that regard, on Sunday, the -- your secretary --

OBAMA: Candy?

ROMNEY: Excuse me. The ambassador of the United Nations went on the

Sunday television shows and spoke about how --

OBAMA: Candy, I'm --

ROMNEY: -- this was a spontaneous --

CROWLEY: Mr. President, let me --

OBAMA: I'm happy to have a longer conversation --

CROWLEY: I know you --

OBAMA: -- about foreign policy.

CROWLEY: Absolutely. But I want to -- I want to move you on and also --

OBAMA: OK. I'm happy to do that, too.

CROWLEY: -- the transcripts and --

OBAMA: I just want to make sure that --

CROWLEY: -- figure out what we --

OBAMA: -- all of these wonderful folks are going to have a chance to get some of their questions answered.

Really, here's the big question Mr. President why did you not protect Americans?




Americans are appalled that this administration failed to protect Ambassador Christopher Stevens and the lives of 3 other Americans in Benghazi and instead blamed it on a video.

Yes Mr. President we do want our questions answered. Yes Mr. President all Americans are offended by your incompetence to keep them safe and the bevy of lies claiming it was caused by a video tape.

There is no excuse that can explain how the citizenry weeks after the attack were kept in the dark about this blatant and murderous planned terrorist attack in Libya. Did everyone in your administration including you show careless disregard for Benghazi or did everyone starting with you lie.


Even if it is a combination of incompetency and corruption Americans died and you continued to campaign as though it was just another headline in the news. You claimed to be offended at the assertion that your White House plays politics with serious Foreign Policy issues?

You want to take credit for Osama Bin Laden’s killing yet it was George Bush that put him and Al Qaida on the run. It also would not have been possible if Dr. Shakil Afridi in Pakistan did not inform our CIA of Osama’s whereabouts.

You rewarded that doctor’s courage with leaking his name to the New York Times causes him to be sentenced to 33 years in prison.

Why? Is the answer is simply for political gain to promote your prowess as a strong leader on the war on terror?

So why would you and your administration lie and cover-up the events of Benghazi? Well, since you have allowed all your minions to speculate that it was caused by a video prior to a full investigation (even though facts disproved that theory resoundingly) then Americans can speculate as to your obfuscations.


Your Foreign Policy has relied on both appeasement and negotiations with Muslim extremists. Your administration is filled with naïve professorial theorists religiously believing since the start of your tenure as President that there is no “War on Terrorism” but instead it is a world police action against bad guys that just happen to be Muslim.

This is why the Christmas Bomber was read his rights 50 minutes after his arrest before being questioned by intelligence officials. Why the Fort Hood attack was called “workplace violence” instead of terrorism.

This is why shortly after Mubarak’s fall your State Department entered into negotiations with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt assuring detractors that they were both peaceful and not interested in forming an Islamic State.

Now, Egypt is a hostile environment as Israel’s neighbor and foments violence against Jews, Christians and pro-western ideals.

Your Foreign policy has failed America. Your foreign policy has made
America weak and has fomented resurgence in Muslim extremists groups throughout the Mideast. This is why you drone on about killing Osama Bin Laden while keeping us in the dark about the new heads of the Al Qaida serpent taking his place.

This is why your administration’s humanitarian and un-constitutional military engagement in Libya has resulted in the worse possible outcome, a dead Ambassador and 3 American officials that might have been killed by American weapons.


If those weapons that killed our diplomats in Benghazi turn out to be American or NATO supplied then it is “Fast and Furious Foreign Failure” that has caused your administration to lie and cover-up the truth.




However, the biggest failure you needed to cover-up was your administration’s inept or cold calculated dereliction of duty to protect our Ambassador and Consulate personnel with full knowledge of the real eminent danger they faced.

Explain that Mr. President. Explain why your administration left four Americans begging for protection to die!

Does anyone else worry about another attack on American soil closer to home in which Americans die while this administration dreams up political lies to keep us ignorant like lambs to the slaughter house?

Saturday, October 6, 2012

2016 MOVIE EXPLAINS OBAMA’S PHILOSOPHY



In theaters throughout the country the movie called 2016 is playing to both small and large audiences with similar reviews. It is a documentary that answers the enigmatic questions as to what motivates President Obama’s mindset when he seems to continually choose policies that hurt rather than help the country.
Filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza lays out a straightforward case by using Obama’s own words, affiliations and actions to leave little doubt about our President’s anti-colonial views that echo the preachment of Reverend Wright a la “Goddamn America”.

We know that many liberals in the Democratic Party have a “blame America first” mindset but Obama’s intent is not just to shame the United States about its unflattering past history but to literally downgrade America from a super power nation to a third rate country in the world.

This movie is a cliff note encapsulation of facts that most political knowledgeable conservatives already knew and an eye-opening horror film to those Americans who have not been paying attention. The president has a deep rooted antipathy toward America and believes our colonial exploits should be rewarded by destroying our standing and strength in the new world order.

His thought to be off microphone comment to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in which he said “This is my last election…After my election I have more flexibility” was a curious and foretelling whisper that angered all those that believe in a transparent White House.

He was talking about America’s nuclear missile defenses and lest we forget about Obama making the outrageous statement back in April of 2010 when Obama declared that the United States would not use nuclear weapons even in self defense. D’Souza explains in the movie that Obama’s goal is to bring the United States arms supremacy to a decidedly underdog’s handicapping to both the Russians and just about every other missile laden country in the world.


The effectiveness of Obama’s policies to downgrade America’s strength and influence in the world has been most notably achieved in raising the national debt that then is bought by China, Japan and to a lesser degree Russia, Brazil, Taiwan and Canada. Thought of in a simple way, if you owe money to the neighbor that lives to the right of your house and you are angry with the neighbor that lives to the left of your house but those two neighbors are in alliance, then what? If you try and make hay with the neighbor on your left the other neighbor calls in your loan. 

Our lack of fiscal strength domestically lessens our foreign policy strength and influence across the globe and Obama finds that a fitting downgrade for what he sees as an arrogant colonial America that now needs to take a back seat in the world.

It is why his foreign policy trips have been so apologetic and to most Americans pathetic. The latest evidence of Obama’s lack of American patriotism can be shown by Obama’s cowering response over the Libyan embassy terror attack. It has been treated as an unknown grassroots Libyan mob uprising rather than a planned Al-Qaeda attack to memorialize 911. Worse there is new evidence that points to the failure of the Obama administration to heed the warning by the now dead ambassador (Christopher Stevens) for greater security protection.

Obama and Reverend Wright are not standing side by side for photographs since he has taken office but their political views are as married and marred in similar anti-Americanism nonetheless. Obama does not believe in American exceptional-ism but rather only in his narcissistic exceptional-ism. 

2016 is a movie that explains Obama’s ultimate objectives. He is not just a radical left-wing Marxist’s socialist wishing as most left-wing liberals wish, to turn America into a socialist’s state, re-write our Constitution and detach our cultural Judea-Christian roots for a humanistic atheism but he view is more radical than that. Indeed far scarier than that. 

Obama has a deep seeded antipathy for all nations that employed colonialism having a sophomoric belief that the western countries of the world raped, pillaged and purposely generated poverty and despair in all the third world countries for two centuries. 

The movie also shows that Obama was highly influenced in his world views by Frank Marshal Davis a communist poet and an adopted uncle into his maternal family home. Davis had an equally antagonistic view of all things associated with capitalism in the western world believing socialism would work if not foiled by western dominance and colonialism.

Any American that has heard the president claim he cares about the middle class, the jobless rate, the high energy prices and the increase of welfare dependency under his stewardship while they equally read about his denial of Keystone, oil drilling leases, taxpayer give-a-ways to failed green energy companies and Food Stamp advertisements across the Mexican border should wake up.

This President wants America and Americans to feel pain. This President wants America and Americans to go to the back of the line in humble contrition for past affluence gained on the backs of the third world countries in his absurd belief of colonial theft. This President will continue his agenda to weaken our country at home and abroad if given another four years to force flagellating policies before he, Michelle and his minority of radicals are satisfied that America has diminished enough to pay for her past sins.
 
No American can watch 2016 and not see the real agenda of Barack Obama.

No American can watch 2016 and want to Obama another four years in office.

No American can watch 2016 and claim it is anything more than a logical explanation between both the president’s own candid statements and his policy actions regardless of his teleprompter rhetoric when he gets caught under the fire of dissent.

Don’t be afraid to watch the truth of 2016 and understand that this professor President’s ineptness is as cynical as your professor of business that teaches you to run a business he never owned and operated. 

Watch the movie 2016 and know exactly who you are putting in charge for another term and if you care about your country you will not give him that "flexibility" to damage America further. 



Friday, August 31, 2012

CLINT MADE MY DAY

Clint Eastwood’s empty chair parody of the current President was metaphorically salient in a number of ways. The first way is obvious in that it was intended to represent a loss of re-election and a one term president.


The second way was that even as Obama sits on the presidential chair he has been absent in his role of leader failing to perform his sworn duties by both ineptness and abdication of responsibility.

The third way was to present the legacy left behind by the ex-president in the wake of his defeat for the history books to remember him as an empty leader. A President that both failed to resolve the country’s problems and gained his seat through empty promises unfulfilled.

Lastly, but no less metaphorically significant is the President’s empty re-election campaign message. Not running on his record because it is too abysmal to tout, Obama instead has run a nasty, despicable attack the other guy campaign. Vote for me because Romney is worse is a devoid, vacuous and empty rationale far removed from “Hope and Change.”

This is why Eastwood included in the imaginary parody of the president’s likely response if he were sitting away from the teleprompter podium and what he would be thinking and saying. “No, Mr. President I can’t say that and I don’t think it is possible for me to do that” is very consistent with the president’s callousness toward our nation’s problems.

When millions of Americans are out of work and the President says the “private sector is doing fine” isn’t that telling Americans to go “Blank themselves”?


When the President ignores Congress and re-writes immigration laws to allow illegal aliens to violate our laws and compete with legal immigrants for jobs and benefits isn’t he telling Americans to go “Blank themselves”?

When the American public want answers to “Fast and Furious” and how and why our government could authorize the sale of weapons to ruthless murdering Mexican drug thugs and he protects his Attorney General Holder by Executive Privilege isn’t he telling Americans to go “Blank themselves”?

When the President tells the Catholic Church that they must fund abortion and contraceptives against the 1st Amendment right of religion to be free of government dictates isn’t he telling all God-loving and constitution-loving Americans to go “Blank themselves”?


When the President states that entrepreneurs should not feel smarter or take credit for the building of their businesses isn’t he telling Americans to go “Blank themselves”?


When the President trips to Martha’s Vineyard, incessantly plays golf and spends most of his Presidency campaigning rather than leading in times of crises isn’t he telling all Americans to go “Blank themselves”?

When the President apologizes to countries overseas for our role over the
years in Foreign Policy as though American has been a saboteur instead of savior to the world isn’t he telling America to go “Blank itself”?


Clint Eastwood’s expose of what most Americans know is the unspoken truth about any callous and absent individual whether it is a deserting father, a parent un-visited in a nursing home, a friend that stood you up or a employee that never showed up for work, we all think the same thing in our minds “Gee I guess they just told me to blank myself.”

President Obama has either with complete inability or with cold calculation
ignored the country. Obama partisan Presidency has ignored leading ALL Americans that the highest office in the free world demands.

Obama has ignored our Constitution by executive fiat. He has ignored Congress. He has ignored our military both fighting overseas and resting in peace in honor. He has ignored the unsustainable debt and deficit even by ignoring his own commission.

He has been quick to “Beer Summit” a stupidly foolish but turns out warranted arrest of his professor colleague and waxes romantically about an imaginary son (Travon Martin) yet is silent while many die daily in gang violent cities. (Chicago)


He has spilled America’s covert secrets to his favorite loyal media rag the
New York Times undermining all Americans security for the sole purpose to make his image stronger for re-election without concern for the damage it does to anyone else.


Yes, Clint Eastwood’s parody was a direct Dirty Harry hit on the truth’s bulls-eye that would be funny if it were not so tragic at the same time.

Given that this president has chided, dictated, ignored, abdicated and fomented divisiveness among Americans maybe an empty chair for the last four years would seem preferable than the empty soul that sits on that chair.

Maybe Clint is wrong in that this president can go “Blank himself” because he has shown a great and consistent skill to “Blank” our country and wants to move “Forward” to “Blank us” some more. Go ahead Mr. President continue to campaign to divide us but I do feel lucky to have Romney and Ryan to make America’s new and hopeful day!












Tuesday, August 7, 2012

DELIVERANCE OR EXTORTION?

The Gibson Guitar company has finally been able to shake the government off its back by a settlement agreement in which no criminal charges will be filed while Gibson pays $300 thousand to the feds and then makes another $50 thousand dollar community service gift to the Fish and Wildlife Service.

The owner of Gibson Guitar was faced with the prospect of spending millions of dollars fighting in court or spending a little over a quarter of a million dollars in a settlement rightfully chose to move forward.



The company would have remained in limbo for years in a court fight whereas now Gibson can resume operations to make quality guitars again.

Back in the glory days of mob control of certain sections of inner cities shop owners would come to open their stores to find it had been ransacked. Before they could assess the damage and pick up the phone to call police a few goons would approach the shop keep extolling their sympathy and proposing deterrence for the future.

For a weekly fee this goon squad would insure that this shop owners business would be protected from theft and vandalism. The savvy shop owner knew as he stared into the lifeless eyes of the mob connected soldiers that they in fact were responsible for the damage to his shop. Word had spread fast that if the shop owner were to make the mistake of refusing this protection he could expect a worse threat to his business. The choice to accept the mob protection was an “offer you can’t refuse” or a “Damned if you don’t, damned if you do” false choice called extortion.

If anyone thinks that the Gibson Guitar case is either unique or singular in the many federal agencies and regulations that have put both business and individuals in the crosshairs of government heavy handed authority think again. Below you will find a well written article that delves not only into the government’s heavy handed regulatory authority that is strangling the American Dream but the lesser known use of proposed regulation used by our politicians to fill their campaign war chests.

“ Politicians call legislation that is intended to extort campaign contributions from a business or industry “milker bills” or “cash cows.” As explained by one California legislator, a politician “in need of campaign contributions, has a bill introduced which excites some constituency to urge [the legislator] to work hard for its defeat (easily achieved), pouring funds into his campaign coffers.”7

Another name politicians have given to such legislation is “juicer bill,” since they are designed to “squeeze” cash out of corporate coffers in return for not harming the corporation with proposed legislation and regulation. So-called “fetcher bills” are also said to be capable of “fetching“ gobs of campaign cash.”


It is another level of corruption used by politicians that is less known and not reported that reminds one of a childhood threat. One sibling sees another doing something that their parents have forbidden and the sibling threatens to go “tell on” the child. The worried sibling pleads and offers a bribe to the tattletale for their silence and the secret is kept. (Only the sibling threatening to rat knows that it was a bluff they would not have followed through with even without compensation for their silence.)

These dastardly tricks by our politician to commercial business are long standing and completely acceptable to Americans who are ignorant or have been indoctrinated to jealously loath business. Increasingly we see politicians use this unethical game of threat and coercion yet there remains too few of us that extol the same empathetic reaction to businesses and corporations as we do the extortion of individual property owners harassed by EPA.

All business owners are individuals and yes there are always bad apples among individuals but to paint a sweeping negative image that all businesses are greedy demonic creatures that should be whipped, chained and blamed for all ills in our society is the indoctrination by the left we have allowed far too long.

It is one thing to be offended that corporate lobbyists sit amongst our politicians trying to persuade their vote on legislation but it should anger us much more to realize that these politician create the influence game in a calculated way by propose legislation to “Juice”, “Milk”, and “Fetch” that lobbying attention and campaign contributions purposefully.

To say that the Tea Party movement must change our government’s over regulation and legislative tyranny is true but if we neglect to teach the next generation a pro-capital and limited government mindset that tyranny will return.

Gibson Guitar did what it had to do to in order to remain a viable company in an ever increasing hostile free enterprise America. We need to feel sympathy for the individuals and the businesses being raped against the wood paneling of Washington’s backroom because both banjos are being played for victims that need deliverance from government corruption.