FEMINIST FEMALE FRAUD

Hillary Clinton's lies have been documented, disproven and disclosed by a number of credible sources and yet she continues to deny, scapegoat others and arrogantly double down on her fallacious fabrications. Her sociopathic lying is neither a disease nor a calculated campaign strategy that is reliant on public ignorance to conjure an alternative narrative from what, the public already acknowledges is the truth. So why does she persist in lying?

We often hear people say "all politicians lie" when talking about the multiple promises bleated out by the candidates during the election cycle. These campaign exaggerations and carefully crafted declaratives on the campaign trail, are relatively similar to our daily barrage of commercial advertisement. Some of those advertisement claims are so fanciful in fact, that the marketers end up mocking their own products, aware that the public is aware, that the claims are so overblown, that it would be foolish to take their hyper-promotion, literally.     

The truth can be illusive in a society that no longer sees a vow as binding, and a promise as an inviolate commitment. Breaking trust once was a shamed act of betrayal, that today is explained as a pivot of opinion. Breaking a promise was once a selfish act of disloyalty, that today is explained as the fault of those naive enough to believe in promises. Lying about everything to everyone was once a defaming resume of character, in which the person's reputation as a pathological liar would outcast them from honorable society, while today we tolerate more and more immorality.

Hillary Clinton is a lawyer. Ironically, the legal profession has always been rightfully or wrongfully the butt of jeers and jokes when it comes to veracity. This profession lives in the world between actuality and proven reality, between circumstantial evidence and alternative narratives, between exacting honesty to a question posed and complete silence to the un-inquired truth. Yet, even Hillary's professional colleagues don't understand her continued insistence to lie, when the facts lay on the table in front of her.

What does it say about the state of our society, government and so called watchdog free press when a consummate, unabashed and completely unapologetic liar, continues to advertise herself, for arguably, the highest office in the world? Not all of her supporters are naive, and gullible voters, that have no clue as to her wanton, unlawful and deceitful double-dealings, and yet many continue to support her contaminated campaign. 

This Hillary support regardless of her complete degenerate duplicity that has been exposed and publicized worldwide, reflects the cultural decline in America that conservative have been lamenting for years. In any other time in American history, someone as brazenly corrupt as Hillary Clinton would be booed and booted off the public stage, let alone be required to defend her actions in a criminal courtroom. Yet, here we are in 2016, facing the possibility that this incredibly vitiated vixen might become our nation's leader.

So why does Hillary continue to lie amid the publically known information that is undeniable? Perhaps the better question is; why are Americans allowing her to lie?    

Why,  when her lies have been documented and exposed is she not called out as liar by the press? Why, is she allowed to continually promulgate this perjurious snaked tongue and spew a spat of dishonest drool every time she opens her mouth, with no one in the media calling her a fraud? Why, indeed are the families of the Benghazi victims called to defend their integrity, while Hillary's poisonous protestations that she did not blame a video-maker, be even debated as truth, let alone believed over them? 

Why is Hillary not shamed for her treachery about her many lies regarding her illegal private e-mail server, her noncompliance with national security protocol, her deletion of work related documents that she falsely claimed she returned to the State Department and her insistence that only personal materials were destroyed beyond forensic recovery. Every American heard the FBI  categorically reveal Hillary's outright lies and wholly deceitfully dishonest explanations, that can no longer be denied. Hillary may not have been indicted but it was crystal clear that she broke many laws.

Our nation's moral compass is pointing south and the path America walks is precariously fraught with a short misstep into destroying all the hard fought values we cherish. The history in the making is not about the possibility of electing the first female president but rather will Americans elect the first known criminally pardoned, pathologically crooked and deceitfully devious female president? 

Hillary's campaign will continue to speak fantasy fibs as she tries to garner the support of women to become an oval office role model. Our corrupt corporate media will continue to doctor the polls showing her in the lead or tied with Trump. Our free press is openly anti-conservative and filled with liberal propagandists painting Trump as either a clown or a goon while they crown Hillary as the first queen and put lipstick on her piggish ambitions.

If being a role model only involves being born a female, then perhaps we should take our daughters down to the nearest female prison and ask that they admire the female inmates. After all these women committed crimes of equal human debasement as men, by breaking the criminal code ceiling. Or perhaps we should take them to the nearest red light district in the city and celebrate the oldest profession of female entrepreneurs, prostitution. They certainly blazed an independent trail without male income support. Certainly we should not be teaching our daughters that "the end justifies the means" otherwise feminists would be supporting the casting couch, right? In fact, would we be talking about Hillary's career if not for Bill?

No, Hillary, and no, American women, we are not going to accept a dreadful example of unabashed sinfulness to be included in the history books our grandchildren read, when in the future they study how America's once proud nation fell into deluded destruction. Another time and another woman, but not Hillary. Women should not support this money grubbing lying wife of a womanizing groper, but instead know an honorable woman, a publically respectable woman, will find the oval office chair soon enough in the near future.

Voters must defeat Hillary the corrupt status quo candidate, Hillary the consummate corrupt insider, Hillary the lying, bribe taking epitome of elitist treachery. We must return America to Americans and our honest hard working values, we must stop the unaccountability of D.C., we must be part of "Making America great again."

CUMMINGS'S OUT PARTY

The recent revelations that the vice chairman of the House Oversight Committee Elijah Cummings Democrat from Maryland, used the power of his office to unleash the IRS attack dogs on True the Vote is astounding.  Especially given the fact that this Democrat Representative wanted to shut down the investigation of IRS targeting by the committee back in June of 2013.

Cummings said on CNN in an interview with Candy Crowley “Based upon everything I’ve seen, the case is solved. If it were me, I’d wrap this case up and move on.” Now we know why the Congressman was so eager to move on. Not only was he and his staff up to their eyeballs in soliciting the IRS to scrutinize True the Vote and its founder Catherine Engelbrecht but apparently Lois Lerner provided his staff with confidential tax information. 

In fact when True the Vote's lawyer, Cleta Mitchell raised the issue of Cumming's involvement in the targeting during a February 2014 testimony before the committee. Cummings flatly denied her assertions that three separate letters from Cumming's office requested the same information of True the Vote as did the IRS. This raised obvious collusion suspicions between the IRS and Cummings that now have been exposed by recent e-mails between Lois Lerner and Cummings's staffers. 

Also noteworthy, is that Rep Cummings's sent a letter to House Majority leader Boehner prepared by lawyers claiming that Lois Lerner did not waive her Fifth Amendment rights because Chairman Issa did not utilize a procedural process in order to hold Lerner in contempt. This behind the scenes advocacy begged people to ask why Cummings was acting like Lois Lerner's lawyer?    

Why did Cummings try and make a circus out of the IRS corruption hearing in March? The Committee had recalled Lois Lerner believing she might be willing to testify, but she instead re-invoked her Fifth Amendment, and after Issa adjourned the Committee, Cummings  had a typical Democrat grandstanding temper tantrum;

" I am a member of the Congress of the United States of America. I am tired of this. We have members over here each who represent between them 700,000 people. You cannot just have a one-sided investigation. There is absolutely something wrong with that. That is absolutely un-American."

Now that a recent e-mail has surfaced from Lois Lerner to Cummings's staff intrusively seeking information on True the Vote perhaps it is becoming more filthy clear that this Congressman is all up in it to his elbows. 

Funny, that the letters from Cummings office to Catherine Engelbrecht group were mirror images of the inquiries being made of the group by the IRS. Funnier still is that the Vice Chairman of the Committee Cummings has kept this correspondence secret from the Committee and its members investigating the illegal targeting of non-profit conservative groups. Funny or tragic that these recent revelations have not caused Cummings to be removed from the Committee, criminally investigated and defamed by the media for his deception.

The stench of the Democrats party corruption is powerful strong and blowing downwind toward voters and one should expect even loyalists to gag and wretch. Instead Cummings is invited to go on FACE THE NATION to make idiotic statements about Democrats needing to speak about Obamacare being a moral issue. Moral?

 

The corruption and bullying of American citizens by progressive Democrats and their use of government unions, have corralled most all of the federal bureaucratic  agencies to ask "how high" when they are told to jump. The use or should I say abuse by lawmakers that have used federal agencies as their own private attack dogs against their political enemies is what the IRS investigation is all about isn't it? Now we find the vice Chairman of the Committee Elijah Cummings with his fingerprints are all over the IRS canine collar with the Democratic party and the sycophantic media holding the leash.

Meanwhile Obama's Attorney General "smidgeon" hunter, Eric Holder has been given the Lois Lerner contempt charges to prosecute amid the public's cynical awareness that our chief justice officer is himself contemptuous of Congress and a race baiting immoral party loyalist.

Americans are not dumb enough to believe that justice will be served while this party and administration  replete with corruption remains in the seat of power. Even the most politically unaware understands that "crap runs downhill" and low rung civil servants are just the mere shovel wielders for those elites that are in denial that their outflow doesn't stink.

Representative Cummings tirade that was plastered in the media and caused Representative Issa to apologize is endemic of the surreal world in America today. Who will be held accountable for the many unconstitutional breaches by this administration? Who will be charged and sent to jail for abuse of power, election fraud, intimidation of their office, withholding evidence, obstruction of justice?  Who will apologize to the American people for the corruption oozing out of Washington and causing a malaise of federal tyranny in America?

HIDING UNDER FIRE

The House Intelligence Committee heard testimony from ex-CIA director Michael Morell on the Benghazi "talking points"  as to why the public was mislead over the Libyan terror attack. When Morell was asked why he drafted a fictional narrative of the Benghazi attack as a protest caused by a video, instead of the truth that it was a planned terror attack, he denied it involved political collusion with the White House.

He explained with the same smarminess of IRS Douglas Shulman's Easter egg roll comment, that he ignored the information that it was a planned attack from Chief of Station in Libya and instead changed the "talking points" to comport with Washington analysts speculating from afar, that it was a protest not a terror attack. He claims that the Washington CIA analysts (not him or White House) decided that the attack was a protest caused by a video even after he requested they re-analyze that finding in light of the information on the ground. 

In a clever but morally vacant argument he told House members that the White House and the State Department contributed only small minor changes in editing the "talking points" (such as changing Consulate to diplomatic post). Yet, what he failed to mention, (fortunately House members understood)  that by the time White House and State looked at the briefing it had already been fixed, doctored, ghostwritten and made to read as fiction for the administration. Fiction I might add that fit the Obama administration's narrative and excuse for inaction.

Michael Morell is a career civil servant and some might say one doesn't advance a long career in government without learning how to expertly dance the sycophantic salsa. One may or may not believe in outlandish conspiracies, and we are all quite familiar with fortuitous coincidences yet, this ex-CIA Chief (currently a CBS analyst) bends credulity like a clown making balloon animals. 

      

His revelations leave Americans to only two conclusions, either the CIA is corrupt and should be referred to as the Central Indoctrination Agency, or the CIA is incompetent and filled with civil servants that have their socks lettered left versus right, making them the Central Idiocy Agency. 

     

There is no question that Michael Morell thinks that both Congress and the American people would have to have a head full of rocks to believe his protestations that there was no political expediency playing out over Benghazi during Obama's 2012 re-election campaign. 

The reason for the Benghazi lie was not only to match the Obama narrative on the campaign trail that al-Qaida was defeated and on the run, but also to provide an excuse for dereliction of duty. The public disinformation by the CIA that Benghazi was a protest also gave cover and excuse to why the President did not send military help to our embattled men. For a sitting President to know America is under attack and do nothing is shameful cowardly dodge of duty. However, no one expects that the president should militarily react to every spontaneous Muslim protest around the world, right? 

Unfortunately for the President and former Secretary of State Hilary Clinton the childish tactic of blaming a group of unknown Washington CIA analysts for providing bad misinformation doesn't pass the RPG (Rocket propelled grenades)smoking smell test. The administration had a drone watching the attack, they had both State and CIA operatives reporting real time that it was planned aggression and the attacks were multiple.

Equally contrary to the Obama administration and his former Secretary of Defense, that claimed we had no assets available to assist our embattled men, Americans are revolted that this administration did not even try to send rescue. To this day the question of where the President was during this crises remains a mystery.

 

Intelligent Americans know that military operations covert or not are never surgically precise and antiseptic. Many things can go wrong and do. Yet, being a Commander in Chief means that a President's political fallout is secondary to his duty as leader of our national interests. Has this President been leading America or handled by his party's operatives?

We know that before the Osama Bin Laden raid there were many earlier operational opportunities to catch him that were nixed by Valerie Jarrett. Indeed, many Presidents have had their covert military blunders that hurt them politically such the failed Carter hostage rescue and Clinton's Mogadishu raid in Somalia to capture Aidid.

Therefore during the height of Obama's re-election campaign, after he had involved us in a UN led war in Libya, after he had proclaimed that al-Qaida was decimated and on the run and after he took almost personal credit for getting Osama, does anyone believe he wanted to test his political fate by sending military rescue to Benghazi, especially during a close re-election race?

Did Valerie Jarrett advise her dear leader that he should stand down? Did Hillary Clinton worry that her part of the Benghazi political mess would only be more messy if the military got involved? What difference does it make? Well, brave men's lives were sacrifice for political careers and that is the difference between honor and respect versus sniveling snakes of evil expedient callousness.  

 The "talking points" are revealing a greater virus present in our government that should alarm all Americans regardless of political party. That trust is truth and truth is trust and that they are inseparable. We know our government holds back secrets in our national interest but we don't expect our government to lie to us about straightforward events. We don't expect our government to lie to us when we are attacked. We should never expect or ever allow, our government to lie over the graves of brave fighting men. 

 

No Benghazi is not a phony scandal Mr. President and Yes, the American people will continue to demand answers as to where you were hiding when America was under fire!   

THE ARB REPORT OR A-LL R-UBBISH AND B-UNK

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on held a hearing Thursday September, 19 with members of the Accountability Review Board that testified about their report on Benghazi. The ARB report that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was allowed to read first before Congress and who was never questioned by these so-called investigators shows itself to be a warmed over government excuse report rather than a hard fact finding search for the truth. 

This (ARB) in-house government review report as to the events in Benghazi, Libya was not a serious, probing, comprehensive or real search for accountability. Instead it was an inquiry of the State Department done without witnesses being under oath, without a transcription of questions and answers, and in some cases without any notes taken and recorded by the fact finders. 

It is one thing for the members of the government review to claim that their objective was solely to find what bureaucratic mistakes and poor security planning existed so as to make improvement recommendations, yet it is quite another to claim no one in senior office is responsible for incompetency. One has to ask why they would call themselves an accountability review board. When did the word accountability become synonymous with faultless? 

The ARB report and the testimony from the Board members came across to all Americans watching the hearings as the genesis of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton infamous line “What difference does it make?” They were not seeking the truth, not seeking to critically evaluate State Department officials for not having adequate security in Benghazi nor did the board want to chastise the Department of Defense that failed to mount a rescue response.

The Democrats on the committee were full of rage but it was at their Republican members for being critical of the lack of investigation done by the board rather than the debacle of Benghazi. These Democrats went so far as to accuse some Republican members as being disrespectful. Yet I was always taught along with many Americans that questioning authority is our duty as citizens.

The real disrespectful action on that committee was when the mother of Sean Smith and the father of Tyrone Woods were placed at the witness table the Democrats left the hearing. I think that clearly defines an act of disgraceful disrespect and disregard by Democrats for the families of the fallen heroes.  

The sum total of what was learned at this hearing was that no one, not one, senior official in the State Department was at fault for a lack of security and that there was not enough time to mount a rescue. To believe those two postulations about Benghazi would require you to not just be a low information voter but also among the most gullible and naïve persons on the planet. 

Whitewash is not a strong enough term to describe the cover-up and disdainful treatment of the truth by this rubber stamping board that produced a narrative report backing the lies told by this administration to the American people about the events of Benghazi.

In the compelling testimony of Patricia Smith and Charles Woods that spoke of their search for answers as to why their sons died, alone and abandoned by this administration we Americans identify in two ways. One we feel their pain that their sons gave their life for our country and officials of that country lied (protest caused by a video) about the cause of their deaths. Two, we agree with their distrust of an administration that continues to promote the lie that there was no stand down order and no resources that could have been mobilized to rescue their sons.

If the Administration and the Democrats supporting this administration in Congress thinks that the ARB (All Rubbish and Bunk) report will finally stop the families, veterans and the majority of Americans from seeking both truth and accountability for the reckless, cowardice and political treachery of Benghazi, they are living a delusional reality.

Americans will continue to seek the truth about Benghazi, and we will not abandon, stand down, or accept the new normal, that when America is under attack, our Commander in Chief of our military, goes MIA (missing in accountability).