SILENCE DESTROYS THE TRUTH

Our President embarrassed Americans by calling the Paris terror attacks a "setback" and then quickly used the bully pulpit on the world stage to disparage his GOP rivals rather than the depraved acts of murderers. 

A week after the Christmas Party shooting in San Bernardino the President went to the pulpit reluctantly admitting that the incident was a terror attack. After speaking summarily of the 14 victims who died he launched his lectern lecture at Americans warning us against blaming all Muslims for the actions of terrorists, and yet again called for gun control.

Yes the hypocrite in chief shows his arrogant double standard. It is fine for liberals to blame all law-abiding gun owners for the horrific acts of a few but not fine for Americans to be wary of a suspiciously silent Muslim community for acts of terror. 

So Americans are being told to disarm both our guns and our frustrated curiosity of silent Muslims unwilling to disavow publically, jihad, a caliphate dream and deeply ingrained anti-Semitism. We are told not to fear a religion that wants to institute Sharia law and take down the Christian, Jewish and western world. We are told that when a Muslim becomes devout, he or she is more apt to equally become radicalized.

Devout means devoted to a religion or ritual, it means piety, it means being sincerely earnest and loyal to a faith and belief. So Americans wonder, how does being devout to a so called peaceful religion end up creating radicalized killers? How does a religion of peace continue to create terrorists? How does a religion promote laws (Sharia) that are chauvinist, misogynistic and hyper-moral in which the consequences of violations are inhumane, barbaric and lacking mercy?

Gee, could it be that Islam is not peaceful? Gee could it be that Islam is not consistent with Judeo-Christian values? Gee, could it be that by continuing to import a tribalism culture into our pluralistic culture that we ensure a backyard battlefield? 

Obama, Hillary and most liberals have always blamed the west's intolerance as for the reason there is a rise of radical Islamic terrorism. They contend that America's foreign policy, specifically our support of Israel was the causation for 911. They believe that appeasement is the curative to combat the fomenting of terrorism and they have had many years in power to test their theories. 

Yet, the Arab Spring and the policies of this administration that changed our foreign policy by ousting Mubarak in Egypt, supporting Morsi and Muslim Brotherhood, failed. Bombing and overthrowing Qaddafi in Libya hoping  a Democratic state would replace the dictator, failed. Leaving Iraq and our military hardware to an Iraqi army trained, but not battle tested, proved to be the deadliest failure for thousands of people have been slaughter by the ISIS state created by their naive and trusting policies.  

So what have liberals learned through all this failure? Nothing. They continue to believe that they can control violence and evil done by the lawless by imposing laws on the lawful. They continue to ignore the threats, continue to give groups like CAIR legitimacy, while being quick to chastise Americans as Islamaphobic. They continue to do what they always do, which is to deny factual outcomes and instead double down on their ideological wishes.

From Climate Change to the state of our economy this administration and its loyal liberals only want to use facts that show their leadership has been successful, or that their cynical phony mirages have substance. In their quest to change America, truth is a political casualty.   

What have Americans learned in the many years of liberal government control?  Well, If we listen to our government then we hear the conflicts in their logic, such as the following;

Islam is the religion of peace, that is also killing Christians, Jews and Muslim families throughout the world.

Climate change is the doomsday fear, even when factual evidence refutes that it is even a problem, let alone a man-made problem.

Our justice system is blind, even though the Supreme  Court needed to change the wording in the Obamacare law to allow it to be viable. Blind even in the control of a corrupt White House that will only prosecute crimes and scandals for those who are on the political right, while liberals receive crony protection from prosecution. Even though Justice is suppose to be blind, Americans can plainly see that our DOJ has been transformed into a political weapon for political gain. Wasn't Carter elected because Democrats accused Nixon of weaponizing our government agencies? 

 

Appeasement of one's enemy avoids war and aggression, even though China militarizes the South China sea, Russia takes Crimea and threatens to take Ukraine while it aides Syria and has Turkey in its crosshairs. What of the hopes of the Arab Spring? It has become the Mid-East madness, a killing machine.

Multicultural refugees into western nations should be open and free flowing to show we are not bigots, even though the terror groups in the world vow to infiltrate among the masses and export jihad to every nation in the world. The Paris attacks were just a taste of what is to come.

America's economy is fine at 1percent GDP growth and what we need to do is spend more, increase the debt and have the FED continue to play for Wall Street while impoverishing Main Street, even though Americans don't need government statistics to notice a dwindling wallet and a nosedive in generational success. 

Those on the atheistic left have all the right answers (PC) and will take away our livelihoods if we dare speak out and question their liberal world view, they can use media to demonize Republicans because they consider the right to be ignorant, bigoted, racists and gun crazy. So if you have a patriotic love of your country, Judeo-Christian values and want our Constitution and borders protected it is fine to audit, libel and slander you.  

So what have Americans learned under the control of the Democrats? I hope we have learned that corruption will be our undoing. I hope we have learned that zealotry doesn't play nice in the sand box with others. I hope we have learned to no longer be silent.  

 

Like it or not we are facing those enemies "both foreign and domestic" that aim to destroy our Republic. We all must swear to save our nation "freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion" and "faithfully discharge" our duty as citizens to defeat both liberal corruption and radical Islam.

Arm yourself with the truth, arm yourself with the courage to speak the truth, arm yourself with the resiliency to reject political correctness and use logic not fear in seeking the truth. Most importantly of all, commit yourself to protecting the truth regardless of how much the media and our government wants to malign, fabricate or silence the truth.    

Let's remember that evil hates us to show, compassion, charity, humility, forgiveness and fearless faith. Let's celebrate this Christmas without concern for political correctness, without worry from those that would shun our beliefs, without rage against the immoral evildoers among us, and simply be the light in the world's dark times.

MARATHON OF DEADLY STUPID LIBERALISM

The multicultural agenda of the left that refuses to recognize the committed nature of terrorists to infiltrate, lay wait, plot, plan and recruit native players for their evil mass murdering jihad is deadly stupid.

Our open borders and liberal immigration policy allowed the 911 terrorists (Al Qaida) to receive visa approval to attend aviation schools in America to train how to fly planes. Just plain deadly stupid.

Fort Hood, Texas, a Muslim psychiatrist shoots and kills 13 service people and wounds 31 more while invoking the Muslim praises to his god and the administration refuses to call it Islamic terrorism. Even though it was clear both before and after the attacks that the doctor was influenced by his association with Anwar al-Awlaki a radical American born imam. More wishing it isn't true, stupidity.  

When terrorists killed our Ambassador and three security personal in Benghazi, Libya, President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton outright lied to the American people by calling it a murderous rioting of local Libyans upset over an anti-Muslim video. Our government and all officials knew it was a planned terror attack and they did nothing then nor anything since to respond to this savagery except to jail an obscure video maker. We can almost hear them whispering "It is about politics and winning elections, stupid. It is not about saving American lives."

Our open borders and liberal immigration policy allowed the Tsarnaev family to falsely claim the need for political asylum and our Homeland Security Agency bought that deception without balking. When the Russians warned that the eldest son (Dzhokhar) was a suspected terrorist, the FBI questioned him, decided he was no threat and worse kept the local police in the dark.  The Boston marathon bombers were imported, vetted and allowed to prey on innocent citizens killing three and wounding 264. Stupid, stupider and stupidest.  

These are only the terror examples with a high body count of those killed and wounded in America. There are many more examples of attacks that are called honor killings or lone wolf attacks that continue to be covered up by officials who refuse to recognize acts of Muslim cultural and religious killings as jihad attacks. Liberals dismissing assimilation requirements of immigrants, tragically stupid.

Between the sleeper cells, our open borders and the social media communication network of these psychopathic radical religious marauders, the left's naivety, lies and political corruption marches forward into the treasonous area of ignoring a known threat to our nation.

What happened in Paris, France will happen in America yet President Obama continues to insist on the implementation of his plan to import thousands more Syrian refugees into our country. Waving his arrogant finger at Americans who do not agree and admonishing us as being bigoted haters. Arrogant and stupid, or arrogant and cleverly flipping the pointing finger to us from his own disdain of America's exceptionalism?

Americans don't care if the jihadists are called Al-Qaida, al-Nusra Front, Taliban, Hamas, Hezbollah or ISIS, we want these people banned from entering the country. We want these inhuman people killed or captured when the opportunity presents and we don't want them sneaking into our country disguised as refugees. Don't stupidly argue that the Statue of Liberty is a suicide pact, that requires us to house our enemies!

No, Mr. President this hate isn't coming from the western world, this hate has always been germinated by a political cultist religion that seeks to kill or convert moderate and non-Muslims worldwide. They hate Jews and Christians. Americans know that compassion does not mean that one must endanger one's own family to help others. That would be stupid, Americans are not stupid! 

Airlift food, drop medicines, and create a safe haven for Syrian and regional refugees while the Syrian and ISIS war rages and when it is over, repatriate them back to their countries. Europe was foolish to think it could absorb a vast number of refugees and not import jihadist. Americans demand that our President and Congress not continue to be deaf, dumb and blind to a culture and ideology that is hell-bent on killing our citizens and Judeo-Christian values. Wake up Congress, and stop following political correct stupidity!

 

What has our liberal government learned from 911? Apparently very little, for they were directly responsible for the Boston Marathon bombing by importing, vetting and providing taxpayer monies to terrorists. What have they learned from Benghazi? Lie, then lie some more about lying.  What are they learning from Paris?  Nous des liberaux sommes toujours stupide. (We liberals are still stupid.)

Our recalcitrant corrupt and liberal defiant leaders in government all must heed the sane voices of the American people, that whether it is illegal aliens raping and killing our citizens or legal immigrant Muslim jihadists shooting and blowing up our streets, they must be stopped. Public office holders number one job, and their oath of office requires them, to serve and protect the nation and the Constitution!

  

Stop importing jihad, and seal our borders! It is just that stupid simple!   

A DEEP DISH DIFFERENCE

At last conservatives were treated to a somewhat fair debate in which the candidates, not the moderators, were able to characterize their political positions. I used the word, somewhat, only because some questions were fools fodder such as "Which Democrat do you most admire?" and also because the moderatos failed to control the time (Kasich) more equitably.

Governor of LA Bobby Jindal set the centerpiece on the debate table in the first tier by expressing that conservatism, itself, is under assault, by both the left and the right. Big bloated government is a product created by both political parties and unless a true conservative with constitutional values is elected little will change in Washington.

That theme carried into the frontrunner tier debates with Cruz, Fiorina and Paul all marking out a territory that defined genuine conservative principles as opposed to Republican-light policies. In fact, Rand Paul's debate within the debate of Marco Rubio's proposed child tax credit that would cost close to a trillion dollars, was an important voter compare and contrast moment, between the old establishment GOP thinking and the real ideals of conservatism.

Rubio may be young and articulate but his ideas are straight from the backroom, boardroom and Washington lobby-room that so infuriates American voters who feel betrayed by the beltway. Elitists conservatism isn't conservative and has only two purposes at its core, raising political money by pleasing donors and winning elections to keep the status quo safe.

Rubio keeps the IRS and the tax code safe and takes a page from the Democrat's give-a-way something for votes playbook, by calling for a child tax credit increase while slyly masking it to voters as not a new handout (which it is) but using his fast talking rhetoric to suggest it is a program to support family. Really Marco, does the government need to give Americans a tax credit to raise their families properly? 

The subterfuge of fraudulent politicians is not always easy for the voters to spot, which is why good debates that pit the policies of candidates rather than personalities of candidates, proves their value to voters. Rand Paul might not be your choice as a candidate but he was exactly correct to call out Rubio, and challenge him to explain how a big government give-a-way can be called a conservative idea. It isn't, and Marco Rubio may have a smooth tongue but on immigration, the economy and on foreign policy his candidacy is the lump of clay lobbyists hope wins the White House.

Voters also learned another key difference between genuine conservative and the faux candidates on stage. Jeb Bush and John Kasich would bail out the big banks and Cruz would not. Neil Cavuto looked at Ted Cruz with incredulity when he responded that he would not bail out the Bank of America if it were to fail, asking him the question again, as if to suggest that Cruz might want to change his answer given the financial hurt it would cause depositors.

That was when John Kasich interrupted, again, as he had all night long, like an obnoxious drama queen that had the loudest laugh at the party, making everyone ask "Who invited him?". Worse Kasich's answer to the bank bailout question was incomprehensible and had more gobble in it than the our upcoming Thanksgiving day bird. 

Still it was Ted Cruz who gave the correct conservative answer to the bailout question, which is a simple, no. The same answer to why General Motors should not have been bailed out.

Either you favor crony capitalism, corporatism and too big to fail socialism or you are a free enterprise promoter of a fair marketplace in which government plays its only role as an ethical arbiter through laws and regulations. Either you favor base-line budgeting or as Carly Fiorina suggested we have zero based budgeting where the government must do the same ledger math, as people and business do in the real world. Either you favor allowing illegal aliens to ignore our laws and still be granted citizenship as it seems Bush, Rubio, Kasich believe or you believe that they must suffer deportation which so far only Trump advocates. We did not hear from Fiorina, Paul, Cruz and Carson on the deportation question.  

Which leads to another criticism I had for the FBN Debates, which is on this very substantive issue as immigration certainly is, we should have heard comments from all the candidates on what to do with our growing illegal immigration problem. Perhaps some have some new ideas yet to be considered, but we need to hear all the candidates comment in order to choose wisely.

So who won the debate? Voters.

 

Clearly with a better panel of moderators, asking more substantive questions, allowed the voters to win this one. We certainly came closer to seeing the deep dish issue differences between the posers, frauds and faux conservatives versus the true constitutional based conservative ideals with freedom as one of its basic principles that founded our nation. One of these candidates will receive our approval to beat back the social progressives destroying the country. Will we chose a thin crusted pretender or deep dish principled advocate? The debate goes on.

DEBATE OR DE BAIT?

Once again the liberal media shows no respect as it demeans and debases conservative candidates in an effort to start a brawl rather than a debate. Their bias and open hostility towards opposing views is now interfering with the undecided voters right to understand the differences of GOP candidates on the issues, and this tar and feathering is getting old, frustrating and downright perverse.

It is another debate in which the public is treated to a reality television show where the object of the game is to dishonor and make fools out of not just the candidates, but the viewers, who are expecting that media will ask simple, direct and relevant questions. Instead the bias that once was done in subtlety by a liberal loving media is now an open shameless farce of impartiality.

The recent DNC debate put on by CNN did not ask Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders tough questions nor did Anderson Cooper ask humbling questions, such as CNBC's first question to the GOP candidates; "to name their greatest weakness", which was intended to set up the candidates for criticism.  

About the only thing fair about the debates was that the liberal media was equally inhospitable to all the GOP candidates, unlike the first GOP debate when Fox news targeted Donald Trump, CNBC tried to spread the acrimonious attitude to every conservative on stage equally.  

However beyond the awful bias there was good news, such as when one candidate namely Ted Cruz, arched his back, leaned into the microphone and challenged the smarmy attitude of the impertinent moderators and with grace and style swatted the left and praised his fellow rivals. That caused the rest of the GOP hopefuls to also grow a spine and push back against the scripted hammer slammer fest.

This was when the voters clapped and sang around the political hat, knowing that if the GOP stands up to the press they become impotent and flaccid. For far too long the GOP politicians have tried to ingratiate themselves with these boorish media types that are only aroused at the sound of their leftist voices, in the hopes that they would be treated with class. Instead, their public images get trashed as cavalierly as junior high school girls, by frustrated and insecure boys unable to secure a date so they impugn the girl's reputation rather than admit their dating defeat to peers.

You can't fix stupid, and you can't redeem the dishonorable. Cowering to those that mock you is self flagellation and stupefying, much like Obama praising his Iran deal while the Iran leaders shout "Death to America". It is weak, demoralizing and gutless along with being one of the main reasons conservatives fret over the fate of the GOP party and its inability to fight for the causes it professes to believe in.

Yet, there is hope. Some of those candidates on the stage showed courage. Dare I say it, leadership qualities that have been so lacking in Washington and today more than ever are desperately needed.

Conservatives, Christians, blue dog Democrats, patriotic Independents and libertarians may be treated by the liberal media as lepers, but we don't have leprosy, we have sanity. We may be maligned by an extremely divisive President but we are not victims, we are seafarers in search of a real captain. We might be prodded like cattle by party leadership, betrayed by congressional backroom deals and taken as pushovers, but we possess inner fortitude and strength that comes from truth over lies.

We must not debate with ourselves any longer or be baited by liberals to feel shame for our patriotic and religious beliefs just because they hold over our heads the threat of calling us racists, bigots and homophobes. The liberals may have the power of the press but power is only daunting if one fears it. How can we be afraid of those so corrupted by their fleeting power that they pretend to be gods by denying and mocking those that love God? 

We should be proud Americans unafraid of differing views and impervious to the political correct bullies seeking to undermine our culture, our religion, our heritage and our system of government. This debate highlighted to all reasonable citizens, that given the current atmosphere of political narcissism, given the  expediency of the political establishment and given the grave challenges the future holds for our country, there is one quality above all others that our next president must have, it is political fearlessness.

  

Time to stop being the left's bait, time for patriots to ask the right question of every candidate seeking to sit in the oval office. The question: Do you just want political power or do you love America enough to restore her from the left's socialism, and fearlessly lead her back on the constitutional road our forefathers intended?