Liberals want big government, oodles of laws and regulations
to control how we shop, travel and eat. Liberal progressive have an Orwellian
desire to control on our media and social networks, in order to indoctrinate
the masses on liberal ideology in order to control thought, culture and
eventually raze capitalism so we all become slaves of the state.
Their cult-like belief in a socialist utopia is born out of
3 groups of agitators pushing America toward its Roman downfall. One, are the
what I will call the Progressive-cultists followers. These are the true
believing simpletons willing to parade for the cause that have been
indoctrinated from grade school. Their shallow thinking leads them to expect
their lives will be happy and complete, if America adopts socialism, rids
itself of Christianity and practices the religion of environmentalism. These
people are naive, ambitionless and seek to blame society for their failure to
find success in more conventional ways. Some wake up and grow up and out of
their moronic viewpoint, while others stubbornly refuse to accept logic into
their lives.
The second group are the power-cultists, these are
politicians, corporations and all those that seek to benefit from controlling
society. They and only they will be powerful in a socialistic world, where they
will make the decisions for the masses and be able to keep the goodies for
themselves.
The last group we can call the expedient-cultists. They
don't care about the culture, or the utopia but rather their interest is in
being able to selfishly game a new system. Be on the ground floor of a new
money market, a new Wall Street if you will, so as to enrich their portfolios,
or to have the government bail out their businesses. Their interests are purely
self-serving and greedy. They know that when old systems are over-regulated,
banned or phased out they can invest in the new pretty toy on the block.
George Soros would belong to the expedient-cultists, while
Pelosi and Schumer are aligned with the power-cultists and liberal university
students would be in the Progressive-cultists group.
All three progressive pot stirrers have the same goal,
marginalize our Constitution, change people's buying habits and control
citizen's life from birth to death.
Socialism centralizes government, while a Free Market system
makes government an outside arbitrator that sets equal rules on the playing
field. What America is today is neither socialism nor a Free Market, instead we
have termed it a mixed market. Basically, it is a half breed, a mongrel between
socialism and capitalism, in which the government has been handed extraordinary
power over people's lives.
Liberals and Progressives want to push our mixed markets
into socialism, and some corporations support that idea as long as government
doesn't micro-manage their business, all because they enjoy the loan guarantees
and bailouts that the federal government offers, otherwise known as corporate
welfare.
Small business
however are hurt by socialism and mixed markets because they are too small to
bail out and government props up their big business competitor, never allowing
a fair fight in the marketplace. When
the government steps in to bail out big failing business they save jobs but
don't allow small business to grow. If there is never a void left by a large
failing business, then small business expansion, entrepreneurial start-ups and
competitive innovations suffer. In a Free Market system a bust from one
business, is a boom for another. Thus voids are always temporary and normal in
the economy that is suppose to fluctuate with ebb and flow.
Our government has mixed our market by using a form of socialism using
counter protective tinkering with regulation, bailouts, and government promoted
market capitalization for things like green energy and alternative fuel
subsidies. In putting its thumb on the economic scale it has maintained the
economy in theory, but has damaged wages, innovation, consumer options, prices
and most importantly job creation in America.
Liberals claim that all the immigrants that come to the
United States just want to start their entrepreneurial dreams, however control
freak liberals have ruined that dream. These are the same people that support
multiple safety and environmental regulations, class action law suits,
operation licenses and zoning requirements, just to wash customers hair. The
immigrants that came to America at the turn of the 20th century, had skills and
worked for cash out of their homes until their cliental became lucrative enough
to open a salon on main street. Given today's rules imposed by liberals, the
stairway to being a successful immigrant is almost shuttered completely.
It was capitalism or the free market, that allowed our great
grandparents the opportunity to rise above the poverty they left from the old
country, to the Middle Class life they enjoyed in America. Today's mixed market
requires the immigrant to break the law in order to achieve their American
dream, and if we were to adopt full socialism, the dream would die out
completely.
Socialism thwarts entrepreneurial markets in many ways:
One, by propping up
big business when it fails and not allowing competition to advantage failure.
Two, by over regulations by federal and state laws that make
the start up costs for small business financially difficult, let alone, littered
with liability under our sue happy society.
Three, by government fiat, not the consumer, deciding
suitable products such by CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) standards, what
new cars will be made, making the government not the open market the driver of
what products are deemed safe and preferred.
Four, by allowing
government corruption of our legislative process in which lobbyists of industry
end up writing the legislation that governs them, as in the Affordable Care
Act, written by big Insurance companies to benefit their interests over smaller
carriers.
Five, by keeping large corporations solvent and negating the
organic nature of boom and bust, creating work security at the expense of
worker advancement. When there is large scale unemployment people assume the
news is all horrible, but the reality is, that many of those temporarily
unemployed, find more rewarding and lucrative careers, jobs and small business ventures that they might
not have pursued, if not being laid off.
Six, invariably an oligarchy forms, in which it becomes
apparent that our Congress no longer has the stomach or the political strength
to fine, regulate or control the titans of big business. The Lobbyists hold
government's campaign purse strings and threaten to pull donations if their
demands are not met, and all of us become enslaved as a corporate soldier, with
little power.
Seven, government can do certain things to induce production
if and when there is a supply shortage, caused by drought or blight in a free
market, by enticing millions of small businesses to pick up the slack. However,
in socialism the oligarchy will quickly savage the small business markets
first, in their quest to own the consumer street. That means government no
longer has any leverage against a monolithic oligarchy and therefore can't help
people in a wide scale supply shortage. "All your eggs in one basket"
is another negative characteristic of socialism.
There are many more discouraging demons to the idea of
socialism, greed, favoritism and dispensable victims are made worse by a system
that claims to seek parity. Equal is great with shared wealth and equally
miserable in shared misery.
But liberals want power, control and equality, like a father
punishing his children equally even though their offense, age and awareness
varies greatly, they all received the same back of the hand.
The control freaks of the left need to wake up and realize
that socialism is an enslaving nightmare, while Free enterprise (capitalism) is
why all those illegal aliens are trying to cross the border. They are running
from dysfunctional economic systems, like socialism.
