LENIN WOULD BE PROUD OF OBAMA ARE YOU?

The absurdity of Elizabeth Warren’s remarks about business’s shared stock and the notion that entrepreneurial success is a communal ownership has been plagiarized and echoed by the President.


Warren said;

“I hear all this, you know, ‘Well, this is class warfare, this is whatever. No. There is nobody in this country who got rich on his own — nobody.


“You built a factory out there? Good for you. But I want to be clear. You moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for. You hired workers the rest of us paid to educate. You were safe in your factory because of police-forces and fire-forces that the rest of us paid for. You didn’t have to worry that marauding bands would come and seize everything at your factory — and hire someone to protect against this — because of the work the rest of us did.


“Now look, you built a factory and it turned into something terrific, or a great idea. God bless — keep a big hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is, you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who comes along.”

Whereas the President said;

“Look, if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own," he repeated.


"I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something -- there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there.


"If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.


"The point is, is that when we succeed, we succeed because of our individual initiative, but also because we do things together. There are some things, just like fighting fires, we don’t do on our own. I mean, imagine if everybody had their own fire service. That would be a hard way to organize fighting fires.


"So we say to ourselves, ever since the founding of this country, you know what, there are some things we do better together. That’s how we funded the GI Bill. That’s how we created the middle class. That’s how we built the Golden Gate Bridge or the Hoover Dam. That’s how we invented the Internet. That’s how we sent a man to the moon. We rise or fall together as one nation and as one people, and that’s the reason I’m running for President -- because I still believe in that idea. You’re not on your own, we’re in this together."


The President has chosen to mirror remarks of a fellow Harvard comrade to further the anti-American socialist’s rhetoric adding his own laughable distortions to win the approval of the takers over the makers.

Why would Warren and the President make such stupidly overt Marxist remarks?

The first reason of course is that both Warren and the President believe this drivel at the core of their ideology. The second reason of course is to speak to their loyal devotees that might have pangs of guilt for being takers and parasites as they cash their government checks.

It isn’t good enough to expand welfare and the Food Stamp programs in order to entice more Americans to see government as their savior but you must assuage both their guilt and any motivation they might have to become self-reliant.

How do you thwart people’s desire for upward mobility? You demonize those that live better and rationalize that they owe you credit for their success.

This concept of shared ownership is replete in the liberal mindset that believes every person should join hands and share a “Kumbaya” sense of community love with strangers. It is the left’s ideological religion called “Social Justice” and is another key component of socialism, namely collective society.


Society is a funny term because it describes a community yet in that community there are both friends and enemies residing in that society. There might be a nice friendly neighbor in that community or a psycho-killing animal equally residing in that so-called community.

To claim to be obligated in conscience (social Justice) by the community at large then means that you are equally responsible for your law abiding neighbor as you are the serial killer. If a member of that society does unspeakable acts of murder then everyone shares the blame for not reaching out as a “village” and nurturing that individual toward wholesome goodness.

It is a load of bunk as any criminologists will tell you as they have spent years studying the minds of these evil human predators. It is a debunked myth that claims that society made them anti-social or that they are all a product of dysfunctional homes. However, the liberal sociologists want to continue to propagate the myth that these pscho-sickos are raised rather than created by their own dark desires.


The whole notion of society being responsible for the choices that any individual makes using their God given “free will” to elect right versus wrong or laziness versus industriousness is a shameful sham.

America is built on the individual’s inalienable right to exercise the free will God granted the human being not the collective conscience. Your choices, your work ethic, your values and your lifestyle have always been and will always be both your right and your responsibility. It certainly has nothing to do with your neighbor. “God helps those that help themselves.”

Liberals want to indoctrinate people into a collective ownership of everything. In fact it is this sociopathic mindset that causes riots, violence, vandalism and chaos. The notion that there is someone to blame other than self for ones misfortune is the antithesis to Christianity and America’s founding of individual rights. Put another way for liberals to understand the word rights equally implies personal responsibility.

Blaming others for your near-do-well life is what is wrong in America today. Blaming society because of your personal inadequacies is what’s wrong in America today. Being pampered and spoiled into believing that you are owed something in this world is what’s wrong with America today.

Thank goodness a large segment of today’s youth is rejecting the collective Marxist’s talk of Obama and Indian fraud cheat Elizabeth Warren for libertarianism. At least they are heading in the right direction toward personal liberty and accountability without the government control nanny.

Obama is preaching to youth that continue to believe in the leftist remake of communism as an ideal that will make America a kinder gentler place and they are captives of their own ignorance and lack of self reflection. Government doesn’t help anybody but itself and it sucks the choices out of the individual’s life when it is not kept small and in check.

Even the most selfish spoiled youth should appreciate the help they have received from their parents who put a roof over their head and food on the table. It wasn’t government that raised them and it wasn’t government that sacrificed for them. It wasn’t their neighbors that bought their clothes and worried all night when they were sick.

It wasn’t society that raised them but each American mother, father; grandparent and older sibling that helped rear them. Family is not society or government but individuals bonded by their blood ties to care for their own. Don’t let Obama and Warren get away with simplifying the word society as though a friendly neighbors encouragement should command the same weight of importance as your father’s day in and day out commitment to work that kept you safe and warm.

It is time for Democrats of all ages to both grow up and open their eyes to the NEW LEFTIST DEMOCRATIC PARTY that is as anti-American as Russian apple Pashka.

LOOK AT THE BIRDIES!

The Obama campaign is working extra hard to sell the American people on giving this ultra partisan and incompetent president another 4 years to continue his bankrupt ideology. His campaign continually shifts to the slogan de jour in order to find anything that can be as successful as was the “Hope and Change” sloganeering that helped him get elected.


His modus operandi reminds one of a time honored trick used to thwart children’s desperate desire to have something or throw a temper tantrum if denied. The trick is called distraction. If you could get the child focused on something else they will forget their original object of desire.

Are the American voters as naïve and easily distracted as little toddlers? Are we so unaware of intrinsic proof that unfolds its reality by our own common eyes on Main Street and Wall Street that we ignore what we see to instead believe a political sophists lie?

The Democrats and the Obama administration certainly believes that they can win an election by once again relying on distraction, slogans, slander of the opponent, demonizing conservative values and making every dismal economic statistic better by the claim it would have been worse if not for Obama.

It is an old political trick. It has worked for them in the past. Will this electorate distraction work in an age of voter awareness? Most parents know that the distraction trickery no longer works as the child ages and matures. Have we matured as voters?

The level of success of this distraction psychology needs more than just a group of Party officials quacking out a duck feathered litany of lies. It needs another flock of trusted squawkers to either repudiate or promote the quackery.

Americans long suspected that the mainstream media had a liberal bias long before it was fashionable to make that conspiratorial claim. Yet, most believed (some still do) that it was innocent bias, meaning that the reporters and editors were human and part of the imperfection of being human is the inability to exercise a completely machine-like objectivity.

However, it doesn’t explain why most major newspapers and television news outlets contain a lopsided number of liberal believing employees. If bias reporting was just problems of human error in reporting stories than news would sometimes lean left and sometimes lean right.

More importantly the argument that mainstream news is a conspiratorial reality rather than a human folly proves itself by omission. Why are the biggest and most explosive political stories not being covered by the news outlets?

If the New York Times wants to claim that the national security stories it printed regarding the covert counter-terrorism operations were the public’s right to know then why isn’t the cover-up of Holder’s Fast and Furious fiasco equally front page news?

Why when the Watergate scandal broke did all the major news outlets jump on the news bandwagon to drumbeat bits and pieces of new details while the Fast and Furious current scandal is barely mentioned?

There is no longer an argument or an excuse that can be used by the mainstream media to deny their corrupt collusion with the liberal agenda and this Obama administration. The question is not whether the major networks are biased but rather to what degree of corrupt propaganda and misinformation are they willing to pass off as professional journalism?

The media has switched to the tactic of omission by claiming their age old paradoxical rational. Claiming that they don’t write the news but merely report it and then furthering that argument by saying that what news makes the front pages is driven by public appeal. If a story doesn’t sell to the public it dies but if the story gains public interest it is incessantly reported on the front pages.

This is bunk. The logic makes no sense. If I have a secret and tell no one should I suggest that it is curious that no one is interested in my secret? Is it strange that no one has asked me to reveal something they have no idea I hold in my mind?

 

Americans did not know about the Stuxnet virus that was created in cooperation with the Israeli and American espionage agencies to thwart Iran’s computers to delay their nuclear program. It was a secret, intended to be a secret and by the New York Times exposing the secret it begs an Iranian retaliation in our future.

Americans understand that covert operations need to be kept secret. Equally Americans want to believe in the integrity of these operations. We don’t expect our CIA or FBI to act immorally but we do expect stealthy operations to undermine our enemies and the threats they pose to our security.

Is the argument that the secret mission of Fast and Furious is less appealing to the American public that our own government sold guns to Mexican drug thugs that eventuated in these guns being used to kill two law enforcement officers (Zapata and Terry) and Americans still don’t know who in our government authorized this criminal law enforcement operation?

The New York Times must be doggy chasing the meaty bone of the Fast and Furious scandal with the same demand to bring the truth to the American people right? They must know that having a corrupt operation approved by the ATF and the DOJ that resulted in hundreds of dead Mexican nationals and two American law enforcement officers is a slam dunk “right to know” story right? More importantly there continues to be a cover-up while the president issues Executive Privilege to insure no more information leaks out can’t be claimed as a ho-hum run of the mill news event right?

Look at the birdies! The mainstream news media is in sensual bed swimming under the covers of the Obama liberal agenda trying to pretend that they are not in full fallacious love with their mister while they commit blatant adultery on their public responsibility to be objectively married to the truth.

The American voters have grown since 2008 with the rise of the Tea Party activists that are educating voters to the tactics employed by this administration and the Democratic Party for generations. Sadly, some voters still rely on the major network and newspapers for their information and those ignorantly loyal voters are what this administration is counting on to win re-election.

We need to grow up as Americans and no longer rely on pundits, press or sloganeering from those with a vested interest in selling us distractions. Any American can look around at their country’s problems and the outlook it portends and know instinctively that we need to reverse course not re-elect those that continue to steer us toward misery.

If you want HOPE then we must change both the president and the Democratic majority in the Senate otherwise you will have proven that corruption, lies, and distractions are more powerful than your own rational reasonable adult common sense.