Friday, October 21, 2016

HANGING CHADS AND RIGGED PODUIMS



Finally the last of the spooky theater of so-called political debates is over. Dressed in a pure white pant suit, Clinton tried to presented herself to voters in the color of innocence. Perhaps she thought she could fool a few naive voters, unaware of her wickedness, or perhaps it was just her costume for Halloween? Maybe she wore white because it is a color that repels flies, but her purity color didn't hide the salt in her blood. Hillary was rehearsed, robotic and not credible with her continuing lies and empty policy.

Trump was relaxed but ready to rumble, and did a decent job of holding his tongue at times against "a nasty woman" who bash him on every question, she needed to avoid. Trump was able to speak more plainly and truthfully in the shorter time he was given by Fox News moderator Chris Wallace. Wallace did little moderating of Hillary, he let her pander and blather.

At times I forgot what the question was, when Hillary droned on and on in clear obfuscation of her record of deceit and failure to point to any success in her long history of public life. Wallace allowed her to duck, dodge and control the time.

However, the most significant media bias that Wallace showed was in asking Trump the question about accepting the results of the election, knowing that fraud has been baked into the coverage. The question showed an eerie resemblance to when Fox News Bret Baier, moderator in the GOP primary, asked Trump if he would back the GOP nominee, if (when) Trump loses the primary. 

Hello Bret, it was Republicans on that stage that lost and refused to back Trump. Hello Chris Wallace, it was Democrats that took their protest to the Supreme Court only 3 elections ago in 2000.  Seems Fox news is so interested in rigging the podium for Hillary, it has forgotten Al Gore and the Democrats history of not accepting defeat? Trump should have answered Hillary's "outrage" comment with baked Florida Chad anyone? 

However, Hillary was not adept at evading the hard questions posed to her. When she was asked about the Wikileaks e-mail that revealed her open border speech, she claimed it was really about "open border energy". What? Is she serious? Free electricity around the world, Hillary? Does she think we crawled out of a walkway paver? 

Hillary didn't stop there, she went on a question avoidance rant, by creating a boogie-man scare, by speculating that Putin and the Russians are rigging the election in favor of Trump. Not only is that dumb, but it was not the most subtle pivot. Just how gullible does Clinton think Americans have become, under our failing progressive public education system? Hillary, when did truth from your tongue get banned within a 200 mile radius around your life? Clinton's excuses were incredibly insulting to everyone's intelligence. What is scary, is her open border, globalizing of America.
 

WALLACE: Secretary Clinton, I want to clear up your position on this issue, because in a speech you gave to a Brazilian bank, for which you were paid $225,000, we’ve learned from the WikiLeaks, that you said this, and I want to quote. “My dream is a hemispheric common market with open trade and open borders.” So that’s the question...

CLINTON: Well, if you went on to read the rest of the sentence, I was talking about energy. You know, we trade more energy with our neighbors than we trade with the rest of the world combined. And I do want us to have an electric grid, an energy system that crosses borders. I think that would be a great benefit to us.
But you are very clearly quoting from WikiLeaks. And what’s really important about WikiLeaks is that the Russian government has engaged in espionage against Americans. They have hacked American websites, American accounts of private people, of institutions. Then they have given that information to WikiLeaks for the purpose of putting it on the Internet.
This has come from the highest levels of the Russian government, clearly, from Putin himself, in an effort, as 17 of our intelligence agencies have confirmed, to influence our election.

CLINTON: So I actually think the most important question of this evening, Chris, is, finally, will Donald Trump admit and condemn that the Russians are doing this and make it clear that he will not have the help of Putin in in this election, that he rejects Russian espionage against Americans, which he actually encouraged in the past? Those are the questions we need answered. We’ve never had anything like this happen in any of our elections before.



Wallace did not call her on avoiding the question, but Trump did. Wallace let her continue skating around her political rink of slick slime, and avoid tough questions, all debate long. The debate allowed Hillary to talk...talk...squawk about what she want to talk about, while Trump was forced  to give loyalty pledges and defend against her attacks.


Trump was right to not answer the pledge question at the primary debate and was also correct to not answer the question regarding accepting the race's outcome, even if fraud turns up bigger than it did in 2012. 

We know Democrats commit voter fraud. We know the media is trying to pump up Clinton and disparage Trump, to influence voters. We know the IRS continues to target conservatives. We know both the DOJ and the FBI is lead by corruption. We know the Obama administration has used every department of government to push for the interests of the DNC. We know Hillary should be in jail rather than running for the highest office in the land. So yes, fraud is all over this election, but this election isn't over.

In fact, the only thing good that came out of the debate was the airing of public awareness that Hillary, the administration and the media have all joined the Democrats in a gang, mob and mouthy thuggery of intimidation by name calling good Americans, to try and defeat the will, of millions of citizens.

Americans can tell the pollsters nothing. They can tell the pollsters that they are politically correct supporters of Hillary (with their fingers crossed) in order to keep face but secretly support Trump. They can say they dislike both candidates. Yet, when the first Tuesday of November arises, that ballot in front of us all, is secret. Will you support someone who should be in jail and aims to dismantle more American freedoms, or will you restore order against progressive chaos?

Americans can negate the media fraud, voter fraud, administration fraud, government fraud, but only if we go in large numbers to the polls and vote for Trump. We must address the demons corrupting our nation. There is only one thing not debatable, We The People, are in charge of our destiny. God help us, to choose righteously.  

No comments: