IT IS NOT THE MOTION, IT'S THE MEET!

Donald Trump was caught in embarrassment, by the release of a recording of a private conversation in which he said tasteless and blustering things about his sexual prowess to another man, over a decade ago. The media is abuzz and politicians on both sides of the aisle are acting holier than thou, in exclaiming that it is the scandal to top all scandals, but once again, the hypocrisy is greater than the hype.

As a woman, I don't condone the salacious comments that Trump made, but equally I am neither surprised or shocked by the discloser of the locker room banter. Men are consumed with two things after reaching puberty and lasting until they die, sex and sexual bravado. Bragging about their sexual exploits (real or imagined) is a common sport among heterosexual men. Perhaps not all men contribute to that conversation, but you would be hard pressed to find a man that did not listen to it, at the water cooler, or locker room. 

Is it offensive, childish, disrespectful and objectifying? Yes. Is it a reason to hate, fire or ruin a man's career over? Absolutely not. In fact, too many men that find that kind of banter inappropriate fail to speak up, so should they too, have their careers ruined? No.

Indeed, many men must endure the exploitive talk of other men about their manly abilities, and nod their heads in order to be included in the masculine club. Telling another man that their conversation denigrates women and is inappropriate, would be admitting as a man that you are weak, whipped, and a mama's boy. The razzing you would take, for standing up against that talk is worse, than silently listening. Most men simply find an excuse to walk away and escape the tawdry dialog.

Meanwhile, playing second fiddle to this scandal is the news item that newly disclosed e-mails reveal Hillary's private agenda, and what most already suspected, it revealed that she is a raging elitist's communist that cares nothing for average Americans. She has a public persona and a private soulless agenda that includes open borders and globalists savagery of our Constitutional Republic. Trump doesn't speak with class and Hillary could care less about the Middle Class, but which will affect your future and your children's future more? The media thinks voter will stupidly chose lying crooked Hillary, over tactless Trump.

One, would think, that this unequivocal revelation would be front page news. One, would think, that this political agenda of hers, is far more important for voters to weigh in light of her bid for the presidency, because it would allow her to enact that devastating agenda. One, would think, that every Congressperson on the Republican aisle would be chastising Trump's words as offensive, but then stating that what Hillary proposes for the nation would be a systematic, offensive aggression, against America's Republic and that, that is by far, the greater immorality.

It is amusing to hear the left excoriate Trump over his tasteless comments while they defended Bill Clinton's actual sexual adultery, harassment and predation as a "private" matter. They venerate John F. Kennedy who also slept around on Jackie while in office, but Trump's tacky talk is offensive? They have a long list of Carlos and John's living dangerously, yet they want us to think they are outraged? The left wants no sexual morality rules as they attack marriage, disrupt public restrooms and want to throw away the status of gender based on birth, and DNA, to instead, be based solely on someone's claim of identity, yet we are suppose to believe they are horribly offended by Trump being a ill-bred male braggart?  

The real truth here is this; neither candidate will win sainthood and when it comes to casting the first stone, for no one in America is scandal free, because we are all sinners. But when it comes to casting a ballot, we are not judging the personal moral conduct of a candidate but rather their leadership and agenda. Hillary unlike Trump is lying to the voter everyday and in all her commercials when she claims to be working for the middle class interests. Her policies will savage our economy and flood the country with more and more impoverished legal and illegal immigrants, while at the same time, we lose more and more jobs overseas. Her administration will be Obama's 3rd term or status quo, put on steroids. 

The notion that this vulgar audio of Trump should persuade conservative voters to throw away the vital interests of their country in order to prove they are not, like the left, morally bankrupt, is folly. Words are not as strong as sticks and stones and Hillary's house is full of glass, smoke and mirrors.

Regardless of how you view the crudeness and crookedness of both of these flawed souls running for office, their agendas for the country are vastly disparate. This election isn't about who has bad taste, it is about who has bad policy.

Now, is not the time to get in motion to the other side of the aisle, based on a raffish private conversation. It is time to meet America's future, either you want more progressive economic malaise and social chaos or you want conservative economic restoration and social redemption. That's the only talk that should make you cast, the first stone cold, sober ballot, that will savage or save your country.    

        

I DON'T RECALL... BUT WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?

The latest information coming from the FBI's release of Hillary Clinton's interview is disgusting. Her innocence is glaringly missing, and her excuses defy any reaction save, nauseating disbelief.

The gag responses are numerous when one learns more of the details behind the evidence that led to Comey's conclusion that Clinton should not prosecuted. Even though Loretta Lynch did not need the FBI to recommend charges, the Attorney General used Comey's fanciful argument of "intent" and ducked quickly under that transparent sheer veil of corruption.

 After reading through the report one can only feel that Clinton "intended" to shield her correspondence, defy FOIA requirements, destroy public records, use the Secretary of State office as the power opportunity to make millions of tax free dollars for her phony charity foundation, flaunt the rules of classified security and pretend that both she and all her cackling cronies did not know anything.   

There has not been one public statement about her e-mails that has been found to be truthful. Not one! Yet we are told by the FBI director that there was no criminal intent. In fact, Clinton answered either "I don't recall, ...or I don't remember" to just under 40 questions in her FBI interview regarding her e-mail server. When she did have an answer, it has proven to be false, fudged and or just plainly untrue. 

Ask any detective in any major crime investigation about a witness lying to them. Ask if it raises suspicion. Ask if it shows a consciousness of guilt. Ask if people can be both ignorant and deceitful. We all know the answer. We all know that you can't have it both ways. Either you are truthful and ignorant or deeply involved and lying. Hillary played the snakes game of one side of her tongue proclaimed she did not know or understand while the other side of her tongue spit out sly lies to the public.

Hillary didn't fool the public, and Comey can't convince us that Hillary did not intend to secret her correspondence from the scrutiny of the public record because she was selling favors left and right. The evidence of her underhanded illegal misuse of public office is voluminous and continues to mock judicial fairness. 

Yet Washington and the press want us to believe that Clinton was a dumb, dufus Grandma, that even though she had been in government most all of her adult life, she didn't know (C) meant classified. She didn't know that public records meant, that she did not own those records. She didn't know public records were not hers to sort through and decide two years after leaving office what to save and or delete. Neither she nor her camp of legal lackeys, had any right to defile public records. 

Loretta Lynch and James Comey have made a mockery of their official positions to uphold the law. Clinton is either a serial mobster or a completely mad birdbrain that should be institutionalized. Prison or mental institution, take your pick, because Hillary has run out of excuses and any amount of credibility. 

I suspect that if the media found that Clinton's e-mails were on tape, and 18 minutes were erased, (Nixon) they still would be calling it a mishap rather than a scandal. It should show the nation the true savagery of a media only interested in outing the wrongdoing of conservatives while excusing the treachery of all things done under liberalism, Clinton and the Obama White House. 

Clinton claimed to have no knowledge regarding her lawyers deletions of so-called personal e-mails and what criterion was used to make those deletions. She also claims ignorance to knowing that Monica Hanley created an archive of her e-mails beginning in the spring of 2013. An archival laptop and thumb drive that conveniently got lost in the mail right after Clinton's private server was publically exposed. Damn those incompetent mailmen, they are making Hillary look bad, very bad.

 

Perhaps as bad as when it was revealed that Clinton publically claimed she wanted the server so she could just use one device rather than multiple devices, and then "oh snap" the truth oozed out that Clinton used as many as 13 devices. Worse, Hillary's staff used hammers to smash old Blackberry devices no longer in use. All innocent and forthright people destroy their devices with hammers, don't they?

She claims to have no knowledge of her server being wiped. Even though, it was wiped years after she left office, and only directly after the New York Times revealed that she had a private server. Well isn't that just some more dunderheaded bad luck? Or is it the slippery snake slithering off into the tall grass, and escaping justice yet again? Seriously Comey, no intent?

 Americans can't believe a single word that comes out of our corrupt government and that includes all our Senators and Representatives in Congress that should be passing, as I speak, an independent counsel law to lay out the facts in front of a grand jury. They should be excoriating Loretta Lynch for not prosecuting Clinton, with all the "There that is there."Instead, they grovel at the feet of Queen Hillary and ignore their constituents, while they hold hearings to feign outrage. This pretend Congress is no longer fooling the masses.

 

Justice has taken a huge stab into the jugular vein and if Hillary is elected the stabbing will continue into the heart of our constitutional Republic. 

When did it become acceptable for people in public office to become multimillionaires? When did justice become so short sighted? When did the prerequisite resume for the presidency fall so low as to allow this level of deviancy near the inside of the people's house?    

This woman should be wearing orange and instead of fending off press conferences, she should be fending off big burley women seeking know what it is like to be a Clinton connected insider. Justice must chase this women to the grave or it will be the death of our belief in the law, and our Constitution that governs Americans, not the blowhards in Washington.