The latest information coming from the FBI's release of
Hillary Clinton's interview is disgusting. Her innocence is glaringly missing,
and her excuses defy any reaction save, nauseating disbelief.
The gag responses are numerous when one learns more of the
details behind the evidence that led to Comey's conclusion that Clinton should
not prosecuted. Even though Loretta Lynch did not need the FBI to recommend
charges, the Attorney General used Comey's fanciful argument of
"intent" and ducked quickly under that transparent sheer veil of
corruption.
After reading through
the report one can only feel that Clinton "intended" to shield her
correspondence, defy FOIA requirements, destroy public records, use the
Secretary of State office as the power opportunity to make millions of tax free
dollars for her phony charity foundation, flaunt the rules of classified
security and pretend that both she and all her cackling cronies did not know
anything.
There has not been one public statement about her e-mails
that has been found to be truthful. Not one! Yet we are told by the FBI
director that there was no criminal intent. In fact, Clinton answered either
"I don't recall, ...or I don't remember" to just under 40 questions
in her FBI interview regarding her e-mail server. When she did have an answer,
it has proven to be false, fudged and or just plainly untrue.
Ask any detective in any major crime investigation about a
witness lying to them. Ask if it raises suspicion. Ask if it shows a consciousness
of guilt. Ask if people can be both ignorant and deceitful. We all know the
answer. We all know that you can't have it both ways. Either you are truthful
and ignorant or deeply involved and lying. Hillary played the snakes game of
one side of her tongue proclaimed she did not know or understand while the
other side of her tongue spit out sly lies to the public.
Hillary didn't fool the public, and Comey can't convince us
that Hillary did not intend to secret her correspondence from the scrutiny of
the public record because she was selling favors left and right. The evidence
of her underhanded illegal misuse of public office is voluminous and continues
to mock judicial fairness.
Yet Washington and the press want us to believe that Clinton
was a dumb, dufus Grandma, that even though she had been in government most all
of her adult life, she didn't know (C) meant classified. She didn't know that
public records meant, that she did not own those records. She didn't know public
records were not hers to sort through and decide two years after leaving office
what to save and or delete. Neither she nor her camp of legal lackeys, had any
right to defile public records.
Loretta Lynch and James Comey have made a mockery of their
official positions to uphold the law. Clinton is either a serial mobster or a
completely mad birdbrain that should be institutionalized. Prison or mental
institution, take your pick, because Hillary has run out of excuses and any
amount of credibility.
I suspect that if the media found that Clinton's e-mails
were on tape, and 18 minutes were erased, (Nixon) they still would be calling
it a mishap rather than a scandal. It should show the nation the true savagery
of a media only interested in outing the wrongdoing of conservatives while
excusing the treachery of all things done under liberalism, Clinton and the
Obama White House.
Clinton claimed to have no knowledge regarding her lawyers
deletions of so-called personal e-mails and what criterion was used to make
those deletions. She also claims ignorance to knowing that Monica Hanley
created an archive of her e-mails beginning in the spring of 2013. An archival
laptop and thumb drive that conveniently got lost in the mail right after
Clinton's private server was publically exposed. Damn those incompetent
mailmen, they are making Hillary look bad, very bad.
Perhaps as bad as when it was revealed that Clinton
publically claimed she wanted the server so she could just use one device
rather than multiple devices, and then "oh snap" the truth oozed out
that Clinton used as many as 13 devices. Worse, Hillary's staff used hammers to
smash old Blackberry devices no longer in use. All innocent and forthright
people destroy their devices with hammers, don't they?
She claims to have no knowledge of her server being wiped.
Even though, it was wiped years after she left office, and only directly after
the New York Times revealed that she had a private server. Well isn't that just
some more dunderheaded bad luck? Or is it the slippery snake slithering off
into the tall grass, and escaping justice yet again? Seriously Comey, no
intent?
Americans can't believe a single word that comes out of our
corrupt government and that includes all our Senators and Representatives in
Congress that should be passing, as I speak, an independent counsel law to lay
out the facts in front of a grand jury. They should be excoriating Loretta
Lynch for not prosecuting Clinton, with all the "There that is
there."Instead, they grovel at the feet of Queen Hillary and ignore their
constituents, while they hold hearings to feign outrage. This pretend Congress
is no longer fooling the masses.
Justice has taken a huge stab into the jugular vein and if
Hillary is elected the stabbing will continue into the heart of our
constitutional Republic.
When did it become acceptable for people in public office to
become multimillionaires? When did justice become so short sighted? When did
the prerequisite resume for the presidency fall so low as to allow this level
of deviancy near the inside of the people's house?
This woman should be wearing orange and instead of fending
off press conferences, she should be fending off big burley women seeking know
what it is like to be a Clinton connected insider. Justice must chase this
women to the grave or it will be the death of our belief in the law, and our
Constitution that governs Americans, not the blowhards in Washington.
No comments:
Post a Comment