In a few days Americans will reveal whether we
embrace American values of freedom, free enterprise, constitutional fealty,
federalism and courage under fire.
Our patriotism will either rise again or continue to
be transformed by elitists seeking to devolve our history and diminish our
spirits. This election may not be the last but it will be the first response to
an ideological siege upon our values as a nation.
When we fought a revolution against the enslavement
of King George III not all the colonists supported the war for our
independence. Some remained loyal to their king, some believed the war to be
both futile and suicidal and still some others wanted to continue to negotiate
with England believing in a pacifist’s solution but we are not descendents from
these weak kneed stock.
We are seeing a divided country as we were prior to
the Civil War but instead of it being a north versus south dividing line of states
over slavery the division is more red state versus blue state over socialism
that would enslave us all.
Why are we Americans even having this debate? How
can a country with a storied history of valiant bravery to gain our freedom that
then fought to ensure all Americans be equally blessed with that freedom want
to now hand it over to elitist bureaucrats?
The answer is socialists’ insurgency. Insurgency in
our educational system from kindergarten to university, insurgency from pew to
pulpit, insurgency from business to lobbyists, insurgency from unions to
campaign funds, insurgency from progressives in both political Parties and
insurgency that has invaded the last bastion of patriotism; American family
values.
Americans have always been reasonable caring and
common sensible citizens that want fairness to be applied for everyone yet even
that has been corrupted by the myth of Statists claiming equality equals
fairness.
Fairness is not always equal but equal is never fair
to a diverse world of uniqueness.
Below is a quick lesson on myth versus fact about
equality being the same as fairness.
A mother of two twin boys aged 10 named Peter and
Paul Smith admonishes the boys not to cut thorough the neighbor’s yard on route
to school. The neighbor has complained and the mother warns that they will be
punished if they disobey.
Paul likes to read and build model airplanes in his
room after school whereas Peter is less studious hates being cooped up in his
room and loves to be outside playing games with friends.
They follow their mother’s rules to not trespass
until one day they are very late for school. Peter presses Paul that if they
don’t cut through the neighbor’s yard they will be late for school. Paul
hesitates but Peter convinces him that the neighbor’s car isn’t in the driveway
so with none home and no one will know. They ran through the yard unknowing
that the neighbor was in fact home and promptly called their mother.
Version I punishment under equality;
When Peter and Paul arrived home from school they
were met with a very angry mother that sentenced both boys to what she called
equal punishment. Both boys were confined to their respective rooms after
school for a period of one week to come out only for dinner.
Both Peter and Paul accepted that they both equally
violated mother’s rule. However, Peter felt he was being punished unfairly
because only he not his brother was being punished. Peter knew as did Paul that
Paul was normally in his room after school and so it was not a deprivation
whatsoever.
Importantly instead of teaching both boys the lesson
of negative consequences to their choice to defy the rules the equal punishment
wrought a very different outcome.
Paul who suffered no ill from disobeying had less
fear to stretch the rules in the future if the worst he could be harmed would
be room banishment.
Peter who suffered the denial of being outside
cavorting with his friends felt persecuted unfairly not rightfully punished.
Peter held jealous anger toward his brother Paul and insecurity over his
mother’s favoring of his brother.
Worse than this Peter’s persecution perception now
negated the punishment lesson by causing him to believe it mattered little
whether he chose right over wrong as he felt disfavored. He might as well
indulge his whimsy and be a rule breaker because nobody cares about him.
Version II punishment under fairness;
When Peter and Paul arrived home from school they
were met with a very angry mother that sentenced both boys to what she called
fair punishment. She banished Peter to his room after school for a week only to
come out for dinner. She banished Paul from his room for a week only to be
allowed to return to it at night to sleep.
Both Peter and Paul accepted that they disobeyed mother’s
rule and deserved to be punished. Both boys hated their punishment and would
love to trade places yet both boys knew they were being treated fairly by their
mother. Both boys learned that if they wanted to avoid this punishment in the
future they needed to think about the consequences of their actions and make
better choices.
Even our creator did not distribute equality to our
likeness, abilities, and characteristics as individuals. We were only given
equally life and the free will to exercise that life either for good or
unwholesome purpose.
“All men are created equal” has been corrupted by
implying it means there are and or should be no differences among individuals.
Yet the real meaning refers instead to humanity’s view on the sanctity of all
human life being equally respected. What you then pursue, dream, hope, aspire
and rise to as an individual is between your conscience and your creator not
under the control or thumb of human dictates.
Pluralism was the construct of our forefathers to
ensure a level playing field of fairness in an acknowledgement of unequal
designs of humans by making the law be equally applicable to all under it.
Those laws had to have the support of the people to be both created and
abolished but no American would be allowed to be above the law.
Adjudication and punishment of violating the law was
also viewed as propriety of exacting fairness commensurate with the level of
lawbreaking (murder) the circumstances of the lawbreaking (self-defense) and
the judgment of jurists and jury to a fair penalty.
Statist in this country have preached socialism in
the pulpit (social justice) have taught socialism in the classroom, demand
socialism in the workplace (unionization) while corporate America gives an
equal corrupted dollar to both political parties to advance socialist elitism.
The insurgency started in the Democratic Party that
has been shrill shill of socialist’s agitators for half a century but Americans
know that the Republican Party has a number of insurgents in their ranks as
well.
Parties are corrupt, both parties seek to power grab
from the people but there is a major difference that has been brewing as the
counter insurgency in the American politic. Do you know what that is? Have you
heard of them?
Yes the Tea Party Movement, the concerned citizens,
the libertarians, the awakened voters, the patriotic activists, the
independents and yes the traditional American that still salutes the flag in
honor for which she stands.
We the great unwashed electorate that wonders how it
is after each election nothing changes and instead grows worse in corruption
and disseverment of our hard fought freedoms.
Well to all those undecided voters, cynical voters
and fooled voters by leftist ideology this is the time to decide which side you
are on. This is the time to step off the sideline. This is the time to vote
with a whole different mindset. Hire them and fire them but don’t admire them!
Patriotic Americans are committed to work through
the Republican Party that still holds hope to be infused with constitutional
faithful, constituent faithful, American value faithful, free enterprise
faithful and honor in office faithful politicians.
We are not delusional, dumb, trusting, and
hypocritical or expecting that those we elect will honor their words of promise
rather we will be vigilant as their boss to keep them to task.
Since 2010 and well into the future elections past
2012 and into 2014, 2016 and so on the new American electorate will push back
the corrupt insurgents against our Constitutional Republic.
Obama and the Democrats have tried to divide us,
make us cynically believe their equality drivel and have numbed down our minds,
hearts and loyalties to our fellow Americans.
Government isn’t charitable,
Americans are, government isn’t inventive Americans are, government isn’t efficient
Americans are, government isn’t successful Americans are and government did not
build our nation Americans did! Americans don’t leave Americans behind our
government did that!
You must vote Romney and Ryan along with voting for
Republicans in the House and Senate for it is our only chance to start the
peaceful counter revolution to the statist’s socialists that have completely infiltrated
the Democratic Party.
If John F. Kennedy were alive today he would vote
for Romney and Ryan for he would not recognize his own party that lacks “Profiles
in Courage”.
No comments:
Post a Comment