STYX, LIES, AND VIDEO TAPE

The President has made a number of statements about Benghazi as follows by the Washington post.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/from-video-to-terrorist-attack-a-definitive-timeline-of-administration-statements-on-the-libya-attack/2012/09/26/86105782-0826-11e2-afff-d6c7f20a83bf_blog.html

“The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. We're working with the government of Libya to secure our diplomats. I've also directed my administration to increase our security at diplomatic posts around the world. And make no mistake, we will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people.

“Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts…No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.”

— President Obama, Rose Garden statement, Sept. 12

OBAMA: “What we’ve seen over the last week, week and a half, is something that actually we've seen in the past, where there is an offensive video or cartoon directed at the prophet Muhammad. And this is obviously something that then is used as an excuse by some to carry out inexcusable violent acts directed at Westerners or Americans.

“And my number-one priority is always to keep our diplomats safe and to keep our embassies safe. And so when the initial events happened in Cairo and all across the region, we worked with Secretary Clinton to redouble our security and to send a message to the leaders of these countries, essentially saying, although we had nothing to do with the video, we find it offensive, it's not representative of America's views, how we treat each other with respect when it comes to their religious beliefs, but we will not tolerate violence.”

QUESTION: “We have reports that the White House said today that the attacks in Libya were a terrorist attack. Do you have information indicating that it was Iran, or al-Qaeda was behind organizing the protests?”

OBAMA: “Well, we're still doing an investigation, and there are going to be different circumstances in different countries. And so I don’t want to speak to something until we have all the information. What we do know is that the natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests.”

— President Obama, Univision Town Hall, Sept. 20

QUESTION: “I heard Hillary Clinton say it was an act of terrorism. Is it? What do you say?”

OBAMA: “We are still doing an investigation. There is no doubt that the kind of weapons that were used, the ongoing assault, that it wasn’t just a mob action. Now, we don’t have all the information yet so we are still gathering.”

“That is what we saw play out in the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world. Now, I have made it clear that the United States government had nothing to do with this video, and I believe its message must be rejected by all who respect our common humanity.”

— Obama, speech to the U.N. General Assembly, Sept. 25

This is what the President said at the town Hall debate on Tuesday October16th per the transcripts.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/2012-presidential-debate-full-transcript-oct-16/story?id=17493848&page=8

QUESTION: We were sitting around, talking about Libya, and we were reading and became aware of reports that the State Department refused extra security for our embassy in Benghazi, Libya, prior to the attacks that killed four Americans.

Who was it that denied enhanced security and why?

OBAMA: Well, let me first of all talk about our diplomats, because they serve all around the world and do an incredible job in a very dangerous situation. And these aren't just representatives of the United States, they are my representatives. I send them there, oftentimes into harm's way. I know these folks and I know their families. So nobody is more concerned about their safety and security than I am.
So as soon as we found out that the Benghazi consulate was being overrun, I was on the phone with my national security team and I gave them three instructions.

Number one, beef up our security and procedures, not just in Libya, but at every embassy and consulate in the region.
Number two, investigate exactly what happened, regardless of where the facts lead us, to make sure folks are held accountable and it doesn't happen again.

And number three, we are going to find out who did this and we're going to hunt them down, because one of the things that I've said throughout my presidency is when folks mess with Americans, we go after them.

OBAMA: Now Governor Romney had a very different response. While we were still dealing with our diplomats being threatened, Governor Romney put out a press release, trying to make political points, and that's not how a commander in chief operates. You don't turn national security into a political issue. Certainly not right when it's happening. And people -- not everybody agrees with some of the decisions I've made. But when it comes to our national security, I mean what I say. I said I'd end the war in Libya -- in -- in Iraq, and I did.

I said that we'd go after al-Qaeda and bin Laden, we have. I said we'd transition out of Afghanistan, and start making sure that Afghans are responsible for their own security, that's what I'm doing. And when it comes to this issue, when I say that we are going to find out exactly what happened, everybody will be held accountable. And I am ultimately responsible for what's taking place there because these are my folks, and I'm the one who has to greet those coffins when they come home. You know that I mean what I say.

CROWLEY: Because we're -- we're closing in, I want to still get a lot of people in. I want to ask you something, Mr. President, and then have the governor just quickly.

Your secretary of state, as I'm sure you know, has said that she takes full responsibility for the attack on the diplomatic mission in Benghazi. Does the buck stop with your secretary of state as far as what went on here?

OBAMA: Secretary Clinton has done an extraordinary job. But she works for me. I'm the president and I'm always responsible, and that's why nobody's more interested in finding out exactly what happened than I do.

The day after the attack, governor, I stood in the Rose Garden and I told the American people in the world that we are going to find out exactly what happened. That this was an act of terror and I also said that we're going to hunt down those who committed this crime. 

And then a few days later, I was there greeting the caskets coming into Andrews Air Force Base and grieving with the families.

And the suggestion that anybody in my team, whether the Secretary of State, our U.N. Ambassador, anybody on my team would play politics or mislead when we've lost four of our own, governor, is offensive. That's not what we do. That's not what I do as president, that's not what I do as Commander in Chief.


CROWLEY: Governor, if you want to...

ROMNEY: Yes, I -- I...

CROWLEY: ... quickly to this please.

ROMNEY: I -- I think interesting the president just said something which -- which is that on the day after the attack he went into the Rose Garden and said that this was an act of terror.

OBAMA: That's what I said.

ROMNEY: You said in the Rose Garden the day after the attack, it was an act of terror. It was not a spontaneous demonstration, is that what you're saying?

OBAMA: Please proceed governor.

ROMNEY: I want to make sure we get that for the record because it took the

president 14 days before he called the attack in Benghazi an act of terror.

OBAMA: Get the transcript.

CROWLEY: It -- it -- it -- he did in fact, sir. So let me -- let me call it an act of terror...

OBAMA: Can you say that a little louder, Candy?

CROWLEY: He -- he did call it an act of terror. It did as well take -- it did as well take two weeks or so for the whole idea there being a riot out there about this tape to come out. You are correct about that.

ROMNEY: This -- the administration -- the administration indicated this was a reaction to a video and was a spontaneous reaction.

CROWLEY: It did.

ROMNEY: It took them a long time to say this was a terrorist act by a terrorist group. And to suggest -- am I incorrect in that regard, on Sunday, the -- your secretary --

OBAMA: Candy?

ROMNEY: Excuse me. The ambassador of the United Nations went on the

Sunday television shows and spoke about how --

OBAMA: Candy, I'm --

ROMNEY: -- this was a spontaneous --

CROWLEY: Mr. President, let me --

OBAMA: I'm happy to have a longer conversation --

CROWLEY: I know you --

OBAMA: -- about foreign policy.

CROWLEY: Absolutely. But I want to -- I want to move you on and also --

OBAMA: OK. I'm happy to do that, too.

CROWLEY: -- the transcripts and --

OBAMA: I just want to make sure that --

CROWLEY: -- figure out what we --

OBAMA: -- all of these wonderful folks are going to have a chance to get some of their questions answered.

Really, here's the big question Mr. President why did you not protect Americans?

Americans are appalled that this administration failed to protect Ambassador Christopher Stevens and the lives of 3 other Americans in Benghazi and instead blamed it on a video.

Yes Mr. President we do want our questions answered. Yes Mr. President all Americans are offended by your incompetence to keep them safe and the bevy of lies claiming it was caused by a video tape.

There is no excuse that can explain how the citizenry weeks after the attack were kept in the dark about this blatant and murderous planned terrorist attack in Libya. Did everyone in your administration including you show careless disregard for Benghazi or did everyone starting with you lie.

Even if it is a combination of incompetency and corruption Americans died and you continued to campaign as though it was just another headline in the news. You claimed to be offended at the assertion that your White House plays politics with serious Foreign Policy issues?

You want to take credit for Osama Bin Laden’s killing yet it was George Bush that put him and Al Qaida on the run. It also would not have been possible if Dr. Shakil Afridi in Pakistan did not inform our CIA of Osama’s whereabouts.

You rewarded that doctor’s courage with leaking his name to the New York Times causes him to be sentenced to 33 years in prison.

Why? Is the answer is simply for political gain to promote your prowess as a strong leader on the war on terror?

So why would you and your administration lie and cover-up the events of Benghazi? Well, since you have allowed all your minions to speculate that it was caused by a video prior to a full investigation (even though facts disproved that theory resoundingly) then Americans can speculate as to your obfuscations.

Your Foreign Policy has relied on both appeasement and negotiations with Muslim extremists. Your administration is filled with naïve professorial theorists religiously believing since the start of your tenure as President that there is no “War on Terrorism” but instead it is a world police action against bad guys that just happen to be Muslim.

This is why the Christmas Bomber was read his rights 50 minutes after his arrest before being questioned by intelligence officials. Why the Fort Hood attack was called “workplace violence” instead of terrorism.

This is why shortly after Mubarak’s fall your State Department entered into negotiations with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt assuring detractors that they were both peaceful and not interested in forming an Islamic State.

Now, Egypt is a hostile environment as Israel’s neighbor and foments violence against Jews, Christians and pro-western ideals.

Your Foreign policy has failed America. Your foreign policy has made
America weak and has fomented resurgence in Muslim extremists groups throughout the Mideast. This is why you drone on about killing Osama Bin Laden while keeping us in the dark about the new heads of the Al Qaida serpent taking his place.

This is why your administration’s humanitarian and un-constitutional military engagement in Libya has resulted in the worse possible outcome, a dead Ambassador and 3 American officials that might have been killed by American weapons.

If those weapons that killed our diplomats in Benghazi turn out to be American or NATO supplied then it is “Fast and Furious Foreign Failure” that has caused your administration to lie and cover-up the truth.




However, the biggest failure you needed to cover-up was your administration’s inept or cold calculated dereliction of duty to protect our Ambassador and Consulate personnel with full knowledge of the real eminent danger they faced.

Explain that Mr. President. Explain why your administration left four Americans begging for protection to die!

Does anyone else worry about another attack on American soil closer to home in which Americans die while this administration dreams up political lies to keep us ignorant like lambs to the slaughter house?

2016 MOVIE EXPLAINS OBAMA’S PHILOSOPHY

In theaters throughout the country the movie called 2016 is playing to both small and large audiences with similar reviews. It is a documentary that answers the enigmatic questions as to what motivates President Obama’s mindset when he seems to continually choose policies that hurt rather than help the country.

Filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza lays out a straightforward case by using Obama’s own words, affiliations and actions to leave little doubt about our President’s anti-colonial views that echo the preachment of Reverend Wright a la “Goddamn America”.

We know that many liberals in the Democratic Party have a “blame America first” mindset but Obama’s intent is not just to shame the United States about its unflattering past history but to literally downgrade America from a super power nation to a third rate country in the world.

This movie is a cliff note encapsulation of facts that most political knowledgeable conservatives already knew and an eye-opening horror film to those Americans who have not been paying attention. The president has a deep rooted antipathy toward America and believes our colonial exploits should be rewarded by destroying our standing and strength in the new world order.

His thought to be off microphone comment to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in which he said “This is my last election…After my election I have more flexibility” was a curious and foretelling whisper that angered all those that believe in a transparent White House.

He was talking about America’s nuclear missile defenses and lest we forget about Obama making the outrageous statement back in April of 2010 when Obama declared that the United States would not use nuclear weapons even in self defense. D’Souza explains in the movie that Obama’s goal is to bring the United States arms supremacy to a decidedly underdog’s handicapping to both the Russians and just about every other missile laden country in the world.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/04/05/obama-limit-potential-uses-nuclear-weapons/

The effectiveness of Obama’s policies to downgrade America’s strength and influence in the world has been most notably achieved in raising the national debt that then is bought by China, Japan and to a lesser degree Russia, Brazil, Taiwan and Canada. Thought of in a simple way, if you owe money to the neighbor that lives to the right of your house and you are angry with the neighbor that lives to the left of your house but those two neighbors are in alliance, then what? If you try and make hay with the neighbor on your left the other neighbor calls in your loan. 

Our lack of fiscal strength domestically lessens our foreign policy strength and influence across the globe and Obama finds that a fitting downgrade for what he sees as an arrogant colonial America that now needs to take a back seat in the world.

It is why his foreign policy trips have been so apologetic and to most Americans pathetic. The latest evidence of Obama’s lack of American patriotism can be shown by Obama’s cowering response over the Libyan embassy terror attack. It has been treated as an unknown grassroots Libyan mob uprising rather than a planned Al-Qaeda attack to memorialize 911. Worse there is new evidence that points to the failure of the Obama administration to heed the warning by the now dead ambassador (Christopher Stevens) for greater security protection.

Obama and Reverend Wright are not standing side by side for photographs since he has taken office but their political views are as married and marred in similar anti-Americanism nonetheless. Obama does not believe in American exceptional-ism but rather only in his narcissistic exceptional-ism. 

2016 is a movie that explains Obama’s ultimate objectives. He is not just a radical left-wing Marxist’s socialist wishing as most left-wing liberals wish, to turn America into a socialist’s state, re-write our Constitution and detach our cultural Judea-Christian roots for a humanistic atheism but he view is more radical than that. Indeed far scarier than that. 

Obama has a deep seeded antipathy for all nations that employed colonialism having a sophomoric belief that the western countries of the world raped, pillaged and purposely generated poverty and despair in all the third world countries for two centuries. 

The movie also shows that Obama was highly influenced in his world views by Frank Marshal Davis a communist poet and an adopted uncle into his maternal family home. Davis had an equally antagonistic view of all things associated with capitalism in the western world believing socialism would work if not foiled by western dominance and colonialism.

Any American that has heard the president claim he cares about the middle class, the jobless rate, the high energy prices and the increase of welfare dependency under his stewardship while they equally read about his denial of Keystone, oil drilling leases, taxpayer give-a-ways to failed green energy companies and Food Stamp advertisements across the Mexican border should wake up.

This President wants America and Americans to feel pain. This President wants America and Americans to go to the back of the line in humble contrition for past affluence gained on the backs of the third world countries in his absurd belief of colonial theft. This President will continue his agenda to weaken our country at home and abroad if given another four years to force flagellating policies before he, Michelle and his minority of radicals are satisfied that America has diminished enough to pay for her past sins.

 

No American can watch 2016 and not see the real agenda of Barack Obama.

No American can watch 2016 and want to Obama another four years in office.

No American can watch 2016 and claim it is anything more than a logical explanation between both the president’s own candid statements and his policy actions regardless of his teleprompter rhetoric when he gets caught under the fire of dissent.

Don’t be afraid to watch the truth of 2016 and understand that this professor President’s ineptness is as cynical as your professor of business that teaches you to run a business he never owned and operated. 

Watch the movie 2016 and know exactly who you are putting in charge for another term and if you care about your country you will not give him that "flexibility" to damage America further. 

CLINT MADE MY DAY

Clint Eastwood’s empty chair parody of the current President was metaphorically salient in a number of ways. The first way is obvious in that it was intended to represent a loss of re-election and a one term president.


The second way was that even as Obama sits on the presidential chair he has been absent in his role of leader failing to perform his sworn duties by both ineptness and abdication of responsibility.

The third way was to present the legacy left behind by the ex-president in the wake of his defeat for the history books to remember him as an empty leader. A President that both failed to resolve the country’s problems and gained his seat through empty promises unfulfilled.

Lastly, but no less metaphorically significant is the President’s empty re-election campaign message. Not running on his record because it is too abysmal to tout, Obama instead has run a nasty, despicable attack the other guy campaign. Vote for me because Romney is worse is a devoid, vacuous and empty rationale far removed from “Hope and Change.”

This is why Eastwood included in the imaginary parody of the president’s likely response if he were sitting away from the teleprompter podium and what he would be thinking and saying. “No, Mr. President I can’t say that and I don’t think it is possible for me to do that” is very consistent with the president’s callousness toward our nation’s problems.

When millions of Americans are out of work and the President says the “private sector is doing fine” isn’t that telling Americans to go “Blank themselves”?

When the President ignores Congress and re-writes immigration laws to allow illegal aliens to violate our laws and compete with legal immigrants for jobs and benefits isn’t he telling Americans to go “Blank themselves”?

When the American public want answers to “Fast and Furious” and how and why our government could authorize the sale of weapons to ruthless murdering Mexican drug thugs and he protects his Attorney General Holder by Executive Privilege isn’t he telling Americans to go “Blank themselves”?

When the President tells the Catholic Church that they must fund abortion and contraceptives against the 1st Amendment right of religion to be free of government dictates isn’t he telling all God-loving and constitution-loving Americans to go “Blank themselves”?

When the President states that entrepreneurs should not feel smarter or take credit for the building of their businesses isn’t he telling Americans to go “Blank themselves”?

When the President trips to Martha’s Vineyard, incessantly plays golf and spends most of his Presidency campaigning rather than leading in times of crises isn’t he telling all Americans to go “Blank themselves”?

When the President apologizes to countries overseas for our role over the
years in Foreign Policy as though American has been a saboteur instead of savior to the world isn’t he telling America to go “Blank itself”?

Clint Eastwood’s expose of what most Americans know is the unspoken truth about any callous and absent individual whether it is a deserting father, a parent un-visited in a nursing home, a friend that stood you up or a employee that never showed up for work, we all think the same thing in our minds “Gee I guess they just told me to blank myself.”

President Obama has either with complete inability or with cold calculation

ignored the country. Obama partisan Presidency has ignored leading ALL Americans that the highest office in the free world demands.

Obama has ignored our Constitution by executive fiat. He has ignored Congress. He has ignored our military both fighting overseas and resting in peace in honor. He has ignored the unsustainable debt and deficit even by ignoring his own commission.

He has been quick to “Beer Summit” a stupidly foolish but turns out warranted arrest of his professor colleague and waxes romantically about an imaginary son (Travon Martin) yet is silent while many die daily in gang violent cities. (Chicago)

He has spilled America’s covert secrets to his favorite loyal media rag the

New York Times undermining all Americans security for the sole purpose to make his image stronger for re-election without concern for the damage it does to anyone else.


Yes, Clint Eastwood’s parody was a direct Dirty Harry hit on the truth’s bulls-eye that would be funny if it were not so tragic at the same time.

Given that this president has chided, dictated, ignored, abdicated and fomented divisiveness among Americans maybe an empty chair for the last four years would seem preferable than the empty soul that sits on that chair.

Maybe Clint is wrong in that this president can go “Blank himself” because he has shown a great and consistent skill to “Blank” our country and wants to move “Forward” to “Blank us” some more. Go ahead Mr. President continue to campaign to divide us but I do feel lucky to have Romney and Ryan to make America’s new and hopeful day!

DELIVERANCE OR EXTORTION?

The Gibson Guitar company has finally been able to shake the government off its back by a settlement agreement in which no criminal charges will be filed while Gibson pays $300 thousand to the feds and then makes another $50 thousand dollar community service gift to the Fish and Wildlife Service.

The owner of Gibson Guitar was faced with the prospect of spending millions of dollars fighting in court or spending a little over a quarter of a million dollars in a settlement rightfully chose to move forward.

The company would have remained in limbo for years in a court fight whereas now Gibson can resume operations to make quality guitars again.

Back in the glory days of mob control of certain sections of inner cities shop owners would come to open their stores to find it had been ransacked. Before they could assess the damage and pick up the phone to call police a few goons would approach the shop keep extolling their sympathy and proposing deterrence for the future.

For a weekly fee this goon squad would insure that this shop owners business would be protected from theft and vandalism. The savvy shop owner knew as he stared into the lifeless eyes of the mob connected soldiers that they in fact were responsible for the damage to his shop. Word had spread fast that if the shop owner were to make the mistake of refusing this protection he could expect a worse threat to his business. The choice to accept the mob protection was an “offer you can’t refuse” or a “Damned if you don’t, damned if you do” false choice called extortion.

If anyone thinks that the Gibson Guitar case is either unique or singular in the many federal agencies and regulations that have put both business and individuals in the crosshairs of government heavy handed authority think again. Below you will find a well written article that delves not only into the government’s heavy handed regulatory authority that is strangling the American Dream but the lesser known use of proposed regulation used by our politicians to fill their campaign war chests.

“ Politicians call legislation that is intended to extort campaign contributions from a business or industry “milker bills” or “cash cows.” As explained by one California legislator, a politician “in need of campaign contributions, has a bill introduced which excites some constituency to urge [the legislator] to work hard for its defeat (easily achieved), pouring funds into his campaign coffers.”7

Another name politicians have given to such legislation is “juicer bill,” since they are designed to “squeeze” cash out of corporate coffers in return for not harming the corporation with proposed legislation and regulation. So-called “fetcher bills” are also said to be capable of “fetching“ gobs of campaign cash.”

http://www.independent.org/publications/article.asp?id=184

It is another level of corruption used by politicians that is less known and not reported that reminds one of a childhood threat. One sibling sees another doing something that their parents have forbidden and the sibling threatens to go “tell on” the child. The worried sibling pleads and offers a bribe to the tattletale for their silence and the secret is kept. (Only the sibling threatening to rat knows that it was a bluff they would not have followed through with even without compensation for their silence.)

These dastardly tricks by our politician to commercial business are long standing and completely acceptable to Americans who are ignorant or have been indoctrinated to jealously loath business. Increasingly we see politicians use this unethical game of threat and coercion yet there remains too few of us that extol the same empathetic reaction to businesses and corporations as we do the extortion of individual property owners harassed by EPA.

All business owners are individuals and yes there are always bad apples among individuals but to paint a sweeping negative image that all businesses are greedy demonic creatures that should be whipped, chained and blamed for all ills in our society is the indoctrination by the left we have allowed far too long.

It is one thing to be offended that corporate lobbyists sit amongst our politicians trying to persuade their vote on legislation but it should anger us much more to realize that these politician create the influence game in a calculated way by propose legislation to “Juice”, “Milk”, and “Fetch” that lobbying attention and campaign contributions purposefully.

To say that the Tea Party movement must change our government’s over regulation and legislative tyranny is true but if we neglect to teach the next generation a pro-capital and limited government mindset that tyranny will return.

Gibson Guitar did what it had to do to in order to remain a viable company in an ever increasing hostile free enterprise America. We need to feel sympathy for the individuals and the businesses being raped against the wood paneling of Washington’s backroom because both banjos are being played for victims that need deliverance from government corruption.

LENIN WOULD BE PROUD OF OBAMA ARE YOU?

The absurdity of Elizabeth Warren’s remarks about business’s shared stock and the notion that entrepreneurial success is a communal ownership has been plagiarized and echoed by the President.


Warren said;

“I hear all this, you know, ‘Well, this is class warfare, this is whatever. No. There is nobody in this country who got rich on his own — nobody.


“You built a factory out there? Good for you. But I want to be clear. You moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for. You hired workers the rest of us paid to educate. You were safe in your factory because of police-forces and fire-forces that the rest of us paid for. You didn’t have to worry that marauding bands would come and seize everything at your factory — and hire someone to protect against this — because of the work the rest of us did.


“Now look, you built a factory and it turned into something terrific, or a great idea. God bless — keep a big hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is, you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who comes along.”

Whereas the President said;

“Look, if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own," he repeated.


"I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something -- there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there.


"If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.


"The point is, is that when we succeed, we succeed because of our individual initiative, but also because we do things together. There are some things, just like fighting fires, we don’t do on our own. I mean, imagine if everybody had their own fire service. That would be a hard way to organize fighting fires.


"So we say to ourselves, ever since the founding of this country, you know what, there are some things we do better together. That’s how we funded the GI Bill. That’s how we created the middle class. That’s how we built the Golden Gate Bridge or the Hoover Dam. That’s how we invented the Internet. That’s how we sent a man to the moon. We rise or fall together as one nation and as one people, and that’s the reason I’m running for President -- because I still believe in that idea. You’re not on your own, we’re in this together."


The President has chosen to mirror remarks of a fellow Harvard comrade to further the anti-American socialist’s rhetoric adding his own laughable distortions to win the approval of the takers over the makers.

Why would Warren and the President make such stupidly overt Marxist remarks?

The first reason of course is that both Warren and the President believe this drivel at the core of their ideology. The second reason of course is to speak to their loyal devotees that might have pangs of guilt for being takers and parasites as they cash their government checks.

It isn’t good enough to expand welfare and the Food Stamp programs in order to entice more Americans to see government as their savior but you must assuage both their guilt and any motivation they might have to become self-reliant.

How do you thwart people’s desire for upward mobility? You demonize those that live better and rationalize that they owe you credit for their success.

This concept of shared ownership is replete in the liberal mindset that believes every person should join hands and share a “Kumbaya” sense of community love with strangers. It is the left’s ideological religion called “Social Justice” and is another key component of socialism, namely collective society.


Society is a funny term because it describes a community yet in that community there are both friends and enemies residing in that society. There might be a nice friendly neighbor in that community or a psycho-killing animal equally residing in that so-called community.

To claim to be obligated in conscience (social Justice) by the community at large then means that you are equally responsible for your law abiding neighbor as you are the serial killer. If a member of that society does unspeakable acts of murder then everyone shares the blame for not reaching out as a “village” and nurturing that individual toward wholesome goodness.

It is a load of bunk as any criminologists will tell you as they have spent years studying the minds of these evil human predators. It is a debunked myth that claims that society made them anti-social or that they are all a product of dysfunctional homes. However, the liberal sociologists want to continue to propagate the myth that these pscho-sickos are raised rather than created by their own dark desires.


The whole notion of society being responsible for the choices that any individual makes using their God given “free will” to elect right versus wrong or laziness versus industriousness is a shameful sham.

America is built on the individual’s inalienable right to exercise the free will God granted the human being not the collective conscience. Your choices, your work ethic, your values and your lifestyle have always been and will always be both your right and your responsibility. It certainly has nothing to do with your neighbor. “God helps those that help themselves.”

Liberals want to indoctrinate people into a collective ownership of everything. In fact it is this sociopathic mindset that causes riots, violence, vandalism and chaos. The notion that there is someone to blame other than self for ones misfortune is the antithesis to Christianity and America’s founding of individual rights. Put another way for liberals to understand the word rights equally implies personal responsibility.

Blaming others for your near-do-well life is what is wrong in America today. Blaming society because of your personal inadequacies is what’s wrong in America today. Being pampered and spoiled into believing that you are owed something in this world is what’s wrong with America today.

Thank goodness a large segment of today’s youth is rejecting the collective Marxist’s talk of Obama and Indian fraud cheat Elizabeth Warren for libertarianism. At least they are heading in the right direction toward personal liberty and accountability without the government control nanny.

Obama is preaching to youth that continue to believe in the leftist remake of communism as an ideal that will make America a kinder gentler place and they are captives of their own ignorance and lack of self reflection. Government doesn’t help anybody but itself and it sucks the choices out of the individual’s life when it is not kept small and in check.

Even the most selfish spoiled youth should appreciate the help they have received from their parents who put a roof over their head and food on the table. It wasn’t government that raised them and it wasn’t government that sacrificed for them. It wasn’t their neighbors that bought their clothes and worried all night when they were sick.

It wasn’t society that raised them but each American mother, father; grandparent and older sibling that helped rear them. Family is not society or government but individuals bonded by their blood ties to care for their own. Don’t let Obama and Warren get away with simplifying the word society as though a friendly neighbors encouragement should command the same weight of importance as your father’s day in and day out commitment to work that kept you safe and warm.

It is time for Democrats of all ages to both grow up and open their eyes to the NEW LEFTIST DEMOCRATIC PARTY that is as anti-American as Russian apple Pashka.

LOOK AT THE BIRDIES!

The Obama campaign is working extra hard to sell the American people on giving this ultra partisan and incompetent president another 4 years to continue his bankrupt ideology. His campaign continually shifts to the slogan de jour in order to find anything that can be as successful as was the “Hope and Change” sloganeering that helped him get elected.


His modus operandi reminds one of a time honored trick used to thwart children’s desperate desire to have something or throw a temper tantrum if denied. The trick is called distraction. If you could get the child focused on something else they will forget their original object of desire.

Are the American voters as naïve and easily distracted as little toddlers? Are we so unaware of intrinsic proof that unfolds its reality by our own common eyes on Main Street and Wall Street that we ignore what we see to instead believe a political sophists lie?

The Democrats and the Obama administration certainly believes that they can win an election by once again relying on distraction, slogans, slander of the opponent, demonizing conservative values and making every dismal economic statistic better by the claim it would have been worse if not for Obama.

It is an old political trick. It has worked for them in the past. Will this electorate distraction work in an age of voter awareness? Most parents know that the distraction trickery no longer works as the child ages and matures. Have we matured as voters?

The level of success of this distraction psychology needs more than just a group of Party officials quacking out a duck feathered litany of lies. It needs another flock of trusted squawkers to either repudiate or promote the quackery.

Americans long suspected that the mainstream media had a liberal bias long before it was fashionable to make that conspiratorial claim. Yet, most believed (some still do) that it was innocent bias, meaning that the reporters and editors were human and part of the imperfection of being human is the inability to exercise a completely machine-like objectivity.

However, it doesn’t explain why most major newspapers and television news outlets contain a lopsided number of liberal believing employees. If bias reporting was just problems of human error in reporting stories than news would sometimes lean left and sometimes lean right.

More importantly the argument that mainstream news is a conspiratorial reality rather than a human folly proves itself by omission. Why are the biggest and most explosive political stories not being covered by the news outlets?

If the New York Times wants to claim that the national security stories it printed regarding the covert counter-terrorism operations were the public’s right to know then why isn’t the cover-up of Holder’s Fast and Furious fiasco equally front page news?

Why when the Watergate scandal broke did all the major news outlets jump on the news bandwagon to drumbeat bits and pieces of new details while the Fast and Furious current scandal is barely mentioned?

There is no longer an argument or an excuse that can be used by the mainstream media to deny their corrupt collusion with the liberal agenda and this Obama administration. The question is not whether the major networks are biased but rather to what degree of corrupt propaganda and misinformation are they willing to pass off as professional journalism?

The media has switched to the tactic of omission by claiming their age old paradoxical rational. Claiming that they don’t write the news but merely report it and then furthering that argument by saying that what news makes the front pages is driven by public appeal. If a story doesn’t sell to the public it dies but if the story gains public interest it is incessantly reported on the front pages.

This is bunk. The logic makes no sense. If I have a secret and tell no one should I suggest that it is curious that no one is interested in my secret? Is it strange that no one has asked me to reveal something they have no idea I hold in my mind?

 

Americans did not know about the Stuxnet virus that was created in cooperation with the Israeli and American espionage agencies to thwart Iran’s computers to delay their nuclear program. It was a secret, intended to be a secret and by the New York Times exposing the secret it begs an Iranian retaliation in our future.

Americans understand that covert operations need to be kept secret. Equally Americans want to believe in the integrity of these operations. We don’t expect our CIA or FBI to act immorally but we do expect stealthy operations to undermine our enemies and the threats they pose to our security.

Is the argument that the secret mission of Fast and Furious is less appealing to the American public that our own government sold guns to Mexican drug thugs that eventuated in these guns being used to kill two law enforcement officers (Zapata and Terry) and Americans still don’t know who in our government authorized this criminal law enforcement operation?

The New York Times must be doggy chasing the meaty bone of the Fast and Furious scandal with the same demand to bring the truth to the American people right? They must know that having a corrupt operation approved by the ATF and the DOJ that resulted in hundreds of dead Mexican nationals and two American law enforcement officers is a slam dunk “right to know” story right? More importantly there continues to be a cover-up while the president issues Executive Privilege to insure no more information leaks out can’t be claimed as a ho-hum run of the mill news event right?

Look at the birdies! The mainstream news media is in sensual bed swimming under the covers of the Obama liberal agenda trying to pretend that they are not in full fallacious love with their mister while they commit blatant adultery on their public responsibility to be objectively married to the truth.

The American voters have grown since 2008 with the rise of the Tea Party activists that are educating voters to the tactics employed by this administration and the Democratic Party for generations. Sadly, some voters still rely on the major network and newspapers for their information and those ignorantly loyal voters are what this administration is counting on to win re-election.

We need to grow up as Americans and no longer rely on pundits, press or sloganeering from those with a vested interest in selling us distractions. Any American can look around at their country’s problems and the outlook it portends and know instinctively that we need to reverse course not re-elect those that continue to steer us toward misery.

If you want HOPE then we must change both the president and the Democratic majority in the Senate otherwise you will have proven that corruption, lies, and distractions are more powerful than your own rational reasonable adult common sense.