THIS LITTLE PIGGY WENT WEE WEE WEE ALL THE WAY HOME!

I reject the idea that half of America is now wedded to a big government statist view on par with European socialism. Instead, the blame for this divide between statists and America’s patriotic faithful is ignorance, indoctrination, cynicism and lobby money corrupting Washington politicians.

Those incumbent Senators and House members talk (squealer) a great game on the campaign stump while they sleep with hoofed feet (Napoleon) in Patriot beds have been destroying (Manor farm) our Constitution.

They have been successful in dummying down the public and as the Orwellian allegory suggests it is hard for the illiterate voter to distinguish which party is Snowball (honorable) and which is Napoleon (Statists).

   

There are certainly millions of liberal voters that came to the 2012 polls for what they selfishly assert is their right to everything from free healthcare to free phones, clueless still today of the truth, that nothing is free. The Democratic Party may have bribed their vote but how long can they bribe their fickle loyalty?

Conversely the Tea Party, libertarians and Republican voters have foundational values that transcend the politicians pimping of their votes for immediate gratification that undermines our Republic. This is an electorate that is growing in numbers and awareness and is becoming more politically astute each and every day.

They vote for the big picture and not the inane selfish pander that politicians on both sides of the aisle try and sell them. Yet, in their ranks there have been schisms and false prophets that have fractured their unity. Therefore, more work needs to be done to ensure coalescence around the ultimate aim to defeat those that want to bastardize our Republic and re-write our Constitution.

Then there is the growing number of voters choosing to identify themselves as independents. While there is nothing wrong in claiming you do not wish to be labeled (who does) you exist at a time in the American politic where there is a chasm of division from left to right with an empty void in the middle.

Put another way there is no middle so what basic foundational principles do you believe in? What rubric do you use to base your vote on a candidate? You claim your vote is for an individual candidate not a party; really, does the candidate share your view about party disloyalty when it comes to their Congressional voting? Did you elect an independent minded politician that will buck his or her Party? What foundational principles will he or she buck their party view over? 

All voters must have a basic understanding of how the political system operates along with a set of values that are not mutable. Compromise and concession is fine in terms of electing what road to take that leads to the same destination but it is completely unprincipled and defeatist to compromise on the destination from heaven to hell or freedom to slavery.

Voters that sat on the fence in this election and broke late for one candidate or the other or perhaps did not vote are Americans groping in the darkness of the political fog. Astute perhaps not, selfish perhaps not yet at least there is hope. 

Hope to educate them rather than to woo them by Republican moderate pander as the GOP continues to believe in their RINO philosophy. The Tea Party needs to reach out to independents and educate them that there is a difference between party loyalty and party pragmatism.

Patriots have no political party loyalty. In a hypothetical otherworldly realty if the Democrats swear off big government statism and wanted to return to foundational constitutional constraints the Tea Party would be supporting Democrats.  Ha I did say otherworldly hypothetical reality? 

We pragmatically understand that the primary race is the time to vote candidate and the general election is the time to vote Party because Party is power in Washington regardless of what the candidate claims he or she will do. Democrats that claim they will not vote their Party’s agenda are either tricking the voters or running under the wrong platform. 

We in the Tea Party Movement containing a number of groups from libertarians to independents choose to infiltrate and retake control of a GOP party that has lost it way, and has been infiltrated by both secular progressives and corrupt political egoists.

We understand that Washington is corrupted by not just money but by its own self reflexive assumption of leadership. Apparently once in office they forget that they are representatives until re-election comes near and they shine up their work record to convince the boss (constituency) that they deserve to keep their jobs.

Yet We the People (the boss) have our own venial ineptitude as we are either too quick to accept the excuses of the socially progressive voting record of our so-called Republican or Independent representative that wears a bull’s hide while mating with both donkeys and elephants. 

The Tea Party Movement understands the three realities of why politicians in Washington continue to disappoint the electorate.

First both the Democrats and Republican Party have shown the public an equal distribution of corruption and deafness to federalism by usurping power and distorting our Republic’s Constitution for their own egomaniac purposes.

Second, both parties have alienated and indoctrinated voters on red herring social issues intended to distract them from the real threat of their over-reach in the continuing expanse of federal bureaucracy.

Third and most significantly both want power and control and just like (Napoleon) all statists understand an illiterate voter is more persuadable than an astute principled voter that keeps their own recorded copy of the barn door rules.    

 

Therefore the patriotic movement to recapture control must start with the return of Snowball. Put another way patriots must help educate the electorate and reduce their political illiteracy not just capture their loyalty.

 Conservatives, libertarians and independents should not be arguing about the color of the barn door (social issues) but be more cohesively connected on the barn’s (constitution) foundational structure.

We can all agree on personal liberty expanding our base to include an even larger circle of wagons around the preservation of our Constitution. Teaching what Americans once knew about government, society and the individual. 

Your personal rights begin when you step into the door of your personal property. Yet, your personal right to dictate to others ends when you step out into the eclectic town square or society’s domain. 

The federal government has no right to dictate social philosophy to you the free individual or to sovereign society that gather’s in your State’s town square. 

When people learn that they already wear the ruby slippers, that the almighty OZ is a sham then maybe we can rid the electorate of tin man voters that trust in their cowardly lion politicians.

THE DAY OF RECKONING FOR AMERICA

In a few days Americans will reveal whether we embrace American values of freedom, free enterprise, constitutional fealty, federalism and courage under fire.

Our patriotism will either rise again or continue to be transformed by elitists seeking to devolve our history and diminish our spirits. This election may not be the last but it will be the first response to an ideological siege upon our values as a nation.

When we fought a revolution against the enslavement of King George III not all the colonists supported the war for our independence. Some remained loyal to their king, some believed the war to be both futile and suicidal and still some others wanted to continue to negotiate with England believing in a pacifist’s solution but we are not descendents from these weak kneed stock.

We are seeing a divided country as we were prior to the Civil War but instead of it being a north versus south dividing line of states over slavery the division is more red state versus blue state over socialism that would enslave us all.

Why are we Americans even having this debate? How can a country with a storied history of valiant bravery to gain our freedom that then fought to ensure all Americans be equally blessed with that freedom want to now hand it over to elitist bureaucrats?

The answer is socialists’ insurgency. Insurgency in our educational system from kindergarten to university, insurgency from pew to pulpit, insurgency from business to lobbyists, insurgency from unions to campaign funds, insurgency from progressives in both political Parties and insurgency that has invaded the last bastion of patriotism; American family values.

Americans have always been reasonable caring and common sensible citizens that want fairness to be applied for everyone yet even that has been corrupted by the myth of Statists claiming equality equals fairness.

Fairness is not always equal but equal is never fair to a diverse world of uniqueness.

Below is a quick lesson on myth versus fact about equality being the same as fairness.

A mother of two twin boys aged 10 named Peter and Paul Smith admonishes the boys not to cut thorough the neighbor’s yard on route to school. The neighbor has complained and the mother warns that they will be punished if they disobey.

Paul likes to read and build model airplanes in his room after school whereas Peter is less studious hates being cooped up in his room and loves to be outside playing games with friends.

They follow their mother’s rules to not trespass until one day they are very late for school. Peter presses Paul that if they don’t cut through the neighbor’s yard they will be late for school. Paul hesitates but Peter convinces him that the neighbor’s car isn’t in the driveway so with none home and no one will know. They ran through the yard unknowing that the neighbor was in fact home and promptly called their mother.

Version I punishment under equality;

When Peter and Paul arrived home from school they were met with a very angry mother that sentenced both boys to what she called equal punishment. Both boys were confined to their respective rooms after school for a period of one week to come out only for dinner.

Both Peter and Paul accepted that they both equally violated mother’s rule. However, Peter felt he was being punished unfairly because only he not his brother was being punished. Peter knew as did Paul that Paul was normally in his room after school and so it was not a deprivation whatsoever.

Importantly instead of teaching both boys the lesson of negative consequences to their choice to defy the rules the equal punishment wrought a very different outcome.

Paul who suffered no ill from disobeying had less fear to stretch the rules in the future if the worst he could be harmed would be room banishment.

Peter who suffered the denial of being outside cavorting with his friends felt persecuted unfairly not rightfully punished. Peter held jealous anger toward his brother Paul and insecurity over his mother’s favoring of his brother.

Worse than this Peter’s persecution perception now negated the punishment lesson by causing him to believe it mattered little whether he chose right over wrong as he felt disfavored. He might as well indulge his whimsy and be a rule breaker because nobody cares about him.

Version II punishment under fairness;

When Peter and Paul arrived home from school they were met with a very angry mother that sentenced both boys to what she called fair punishment. She banished Peter to his room after school for a week only to come out for dinner. She banished Paul from his room for a week only to be allowed to return to it at night to sleep.

Both Peter and Paul accepted that they disobeyed mother’s rule and deserved to be punished. Both boys hated their punishment and would love to trade places yet both boys knew they were being treated fairly by their mother. Both boys learned that if they wanted to avoid this punishment in the future they needed to think about the consequences of their actions and make better choices.  

Even our creator did not distribute equality to our likeness, abilities, and characteristics as individuals. We were only given equally life and the free will to exercise that life either for good or unwholesome purpose.

“All men are created equal” has been corrupted by implying it means there are and or should be no differences among individuals. Yet the real meaning refers instead to humanity’s view on the sanctity of all human life being equally respected. What you then pursue, dream, hope, aspire and rise to as an individual is between your conscience and your creator not under the control or thumb of human dictates.

Pluralism was the construct of our forefathers to ensure a level playing field of fairness in an acknowledgement of unequal designs of humans by making the law be equally applicable to all under it. Those laws had to have the support of the people to be both created and abolished but no American would be allowed to be above the law.

Adjudication and punishment of violating the law was also viewed as propriety of exacting fairness commensurate with the level of lawbreaking (murder) the circumstances of the lawbreaking (self-defense) and the judgment of jurists and jury to a fair penalty.

Statist in this country have preached socialism in the pulpit (social justice) have taught socialism in the classroom, demand socialism in the workplace (unionization) while corporate America gives an equal corrupted dollar to both political parties to advance socialist elitism. 

The insurgency started in the Democratic Party that has been shrill shill of socialist’s agitators for half a century but Americans know that the Republican Party has a number of insurgents in their ranks as well.

Parties are corrupt, both parties seek to power grab from the people but there is a major difference that has been brewing as the counter insurgency in the American politic. Do you know what that is? Have you heard of them?

Yes the Tea Party Movement, the concerned citizens, the libertarians, the awakened voters, the patriotic activists, the independents and yes the traditional American that still salutes the flag in honor for which she stands.

We the great unwashed electorate that wonders how it is after each election nothing changes and instead grows worse in corruption and disseverment of our hard fought freedoms. 

Well to all those undecided voters, cynical voters and fooled voters by leftist ideology this is the time to decide which side you are on. This is the time to step off the sideline. This is the time to vote with a whole different mindset. Hire them and fire them but don’t admire them!

Patriotic Americans are committed to work through the Republican Party that still holds hope to be infused with constitutional faithful, constituent faithful, American value faithful, free enterprise faithful and honor in office faithful politicians.

We are not delusional, dumb, trusting, and hypocritical or expecting that those we elect will honor their words of promise rather we will be vigilant as their boss to keep them to task.

Since 2010 and well into the future elections past 2012 and into 2014, 2016 and so on the new American electorate will push back the corrupt insurgents against our Constitutional Republic. 

Obama and the Democrats have tried to divide us, make us cynically believe their equality drivel and have numbed down our minds, hearts and loyalties to our fellow Americans.

Government isn’t charitable, Americans are, government isn’t inventive Americans are, government isn’t efficient Americans are, government isn’t successful Americans are and government did not build our nation Americans did! Americans don’t leave Americans behind our government did that! 

You must vote Romney and Ryan along with voting for Republicans in the House and Senate for it is our only chance to start the peaceful counter revolution to the statist’s socialists that have completely infiltrated the Democratic Party.

If John F. Kennedy were alive today he would vote for Romney and Ryan for he would not recognize his own party that lacks “Profiles in Courage”.

STYX, LIES, AND VIDEO TAPE

The President has made a number of statements about Benghazi as follows by the Washington post.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/from-video-to-terrorist-attack-a-definitive-timeline-of-administration-statements-on-the-libya-attack/2012/09/26/86105782-0826-11e2-afff-d6c7f20a83bf_blog.html

“The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. We're working with the government of Libya to secure our diplomats. I've also directed my administration to increase our security at diplomatic posts around the world. And make no mistake, we will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people.

“Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts…No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.”

— President Obama, Rose Garden statement, Sept. 12

OBAMA: “What we’ve seen over the last week, week and a half, is something that actually we've seen in the past, where there is an offensive video or cartoon directed at the prophet Muhammad. And this is obviously something that then is used as an excuse by some to carry out inexcusable violent acts directed at Westerners or Americans.

“And my number-one priority is always to keep our diplomats safe and to keep our embassies safe. And so when the initial events happened in Cairo and all across the region, we worked with Secretary Clinton to redouble our security and to send a message to the leaders of these countries, essentially saying, although we had nothing to do with the video, we find it offensive, it's not representative of America's views, how we treat each other with respect when it comes to their religious beliefs, but we will not tolerate violence.”

QUESTION: “We have reports that the White House said today that the attacks in Libya were a terrorist attack. Do you have information indicating that it was Iran, or al-Qaeda was behind organizing the protests?”

OBAMA: “Well, we're still doing an investigation, and there are going to be different circumstances in different countries. And so I don’t want to speak to something until we have all the information. What we do know is that the natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests.”

— President Obama, Univision Town Hall, Sept. 20

QUESTION: “I heard Hillary Clinton say it was an act of terrorism. Is it? What do you say?”

OBAMA: “We are still doing an investigation. There is no doubt that the kind of weapons that were used, the ongoing assault, that it wasn’t just a mob action. Now, we don’t have all the information yet so we are still gathering.”

“That is what we saw play out in the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world. Now, I have made it clear that the United States government had nothing to do with this video, and I believe its message must be rejected by all who respect our common humanity.”

— Obama, speech to the U.N. General Assembly, Sept. 25

This is what the President said at the town Hall debate on Tuesday October16th per the transcripts.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/2012-presidential-debate-full-transcript-oct-16/story?id=17493848&page=8

QUESTION: We were sitting around, talking about Libya, and we were reading and became aware of reports that the State Department refused extra security for our embassy in Benghazi, Libya, prior to the attacks that killed four Americans.

Who was it that denied enhanced security and why?

OBAMA: Well, let me first of all talk about our diplomats, because they serve all around the world and do an incredible job in a very dangerous situation. And these aren't just representatives of the United States, they are my representatives. I send them there, oftentimes into harm's way. I know these folks and I know their families. So nobody is more concerned about their safety and security than I am.
So as soon as we found out that the Benghazi consulate was being overrun, I was on the phone with my national security team and I gave them three instructions.

Number one, beef up our security and procedures, not just in Libya, but at every embassy and consulate in the region.
Number two, investigate exactly what happened, regardless of where the facts lead us, to make sure folks are held accountable and it doesn't happen again.

And number three, we are going to find out who did this and we're going to hunt them down, because one of the things that I've said throughout my presidency is when folks mess with Americans, we go after them.

OBAMA: Now Governor Romney had a very different response. While we were still dealing with our diplomats being threatened, Governor Romney put out a press release, trying to make political points, and that's not how a commander in chief operates. You don't turn national security into a political issue. Certainly not right when it's happening. And people -- not everybody agrees with some of the decisions I've made. But when it comes to our national security, I mean what I say. I said I'd end the war in Libya -- in -- in Iraq, and I did.

I said that we'd go after al-Qaeda and bin Laden, we have. I said we'd transition out of Afghanistan, and start making sure that Afghans are responsible for their own security, that's what I'm doing. And when it comes to this issue, when I say that we are going to find out exactly what happened, everybody will be held accountable. And I am ultimately responsible for what's taking place there because these are my folks, and I'm the one who has to greet those coffins when they come home. You know that I mean what I say.

CROWLEY: Because we're -- we're closing in, I want to still get a lot of people in. I want to ask you something, Mr. President, and then have the governor just quickly.

Your secretary of state, as I'm sure you know, has said that she takes full responsibility for the attack on the diplomatic mission in Benghazi. Does the buck stop with your secretary of state as far as what went on here?

OBAMA: Secretary Clinton has done an extraordinary job. But she works for me. I'm the president and I'm always responsible, and that's why nobody's more interested in finding out exactly what happened than I do.

The day after the attack, governor, I stood in the Rose Garden and I told the American people in the world that we are going to find out exactly what happened. That this was an act of terror and I also said that we're going to hunt down those who committed this crime. 

And then a few days later, I was there greeting the caskets coming into Andrews Air Force Base and grieving with the families.

And the suggestion that anybody in my team, whether the Secretary of State, our U.N. Ambassador, anybody on my team would play politics or mislead when we've lost four of our own, governor, is offensive. That's not what we do. That's not what I do as president, that's not what I do as Commander in Chief.


CROWLEY: Governor, if you want to...

ROMNEY: Yes, I -- I...

CROWLEY: ... quickly to this please.

ROMNEY: I -- I think interesting the president just said something which -- which is that on the day after the attack he went into the Rose Garden and said that this was an act of terror.

OBAMA: That's what I said.

ROMNEY: You said in the Rose Garden the day after the attack, it was an act of terror. It was not a spontaneous demonstration, is that what you're saying?

OBAMA: Please proceed governor.

ROMNEY: I want to make sure we get that for the record because it took the

president 14 days before he called the attack in Benghazi an act of terror.

OBAMA: Get the transcript.

CROWLEY: It -- it -- it -- he did in fact, sir. So let me -- let me call it an act of terror...

OBAMA: Can you say that a little louder, Candy?

CROWLEY: He -- he did call it an act of terror. It did as well take -- it did as well take two weeks or so for the whole idea there being a riot out there about this tape to come out. You are correct about that.

ROMNEY: This -- the administration -- the administration indicated this was a reaction to a video and was a spontaneous reaction.

CROWLEY: It did.

ROMNEY: It took them a long time to say this was a terrorist act by a terrorist group. And to suggest -- am I incorrect in that regard, on Sunday, the -- your secretary --

OBAMA: Candy?

ROMNEY: Excuse me. The ambassador of the United Nations went on the

Sunday television shows and spoke about how --

OBAMA: Candy, I'm --

ROMNEY: -- this was a spontaneous --

CROWLEY: Mr. President, let me --

OBAMA: I'm happy to have a longer conversation --

CROWLEY: I know you --

OBAMA: -- about foreign policy.

CROWLEY: Absolutely. But I want to -- I want to move you on and also --

OBAMA: OK. I'm happy to do that, too.

CROWLEY: -- the transcripts and --

OBAMA: I just want to make sure that --

CROWLEY: -- figure out what we --

OBAMA: -- all of these wonderful folks are going to have a chance to get some of their questions answered.

Really, here's the big question Mr. President why did you not protect Americans?

Americans are appalled that this administration failed to protect Ambassador Christopher Stevens and the lives of 3 other Americans in Benghazi and instead blamed it on a video.

Yes Mr. President we do want our questions answered. Yes Mr. President all Americans are offended by your incompetence to keep them safe and the bevy of lies claiming it was caused by a video tape.

There is no excuse that can explain how the citizenry weeks after the attack were kept in the dark about this blatant and murderous planned terrorist attack in Libya. Did everyone in your administration including you show careless disregard for Benghazi or did everyone starting with you lie.

Even if it is a combination of incompetency and corruption Americans died and you continued to campaign as though it was just another headline in the news. You claimed to be offended at the assertion that your White House plays politics with serious Foreign Policy issues?

You want to take credit for Osama Bin Laden’s killing yet it was George Bush that put him and Al Qaida on the run. It also would not have been possible if Dr. Shakil Afridi in Pakistan did not inform our CIA of Osama’s whereabouts.

You rewarded that doctor’s courage with leaking his name to the New York Times causes him to be sentenced to 33 years in prison.

Why? Is the answer is simply for political gain to promote your prowess as a strong leader on the war on terror?

So why would you and your administration lie and cover-up the events of Benghazi? Well, since you have allowed all your minions to speculate that it was caused by a video prior to a full investigation (even though facts disproved that theory resoundingly) then Americans can speculate as to your obfuscations.

Your Foreign Policy has relied on both appeasement and negotiations with Muslim extremists. Your administration is filled with naïve professorial theorists religiously believing since the start of your tenure as President that there is no “War on Terrorism” but instead it is a world police action against bad guys that just happen to be Muslim.

This is why the Christmas Bomber was read his rights 50 minutes after his arrest before being questioned by intelligence officials. Why the Fort Hood attack was called “workplace violence” instead of terrorism.

This is why shortly after Mubarak’s fall your State Department entered into negotiations with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt assuring detractors that they were both peaceful and not interested in forming an Islamic State.

Now, Egypt is a hostile environment as Israel’s neighbor and foments violence against Jews, Christians and pro-western ideals.

Your Foreign policy has failed America. Your foreign policy has made
America weak and has fomented resurgence in Muslim extremists groups throughout the Mideast. This is why you drone on about killing Osama Bin Laden while keeping us in the dark about the new heads of the Al Qaida serpent taking his place.

This is why your administration’s humanitarian and un-constitutional military engagement in Libya has resulted in the worse possible outcome, a dead Ambassador and 3 American officials that might have been killed by American weapons.

If those weapons that killed our diplomats in Benghazi turn out to be American or NATO supplied then it is “Fast and Furious Foreign Failure” that has caused your administration to lie and cover-up the truth.




However, the biggest failure you needed to cover-up was your administration’s inept or cold calculated dereliction of duty to protect our Ambassador and Consulate personnel with full knowledge of the real eminent danger they faced.

Explain that Mr. President. Explain why your administration left four Americans begging for protection to die!

Does anyone else worry about another attack on American soil closer to home in which Americans die while this administration dreams up political lies to keep us ignorant like lambs to the slaughter house?

2016 MOVIE EXPLAINS OBAMA’S PHILOSOPHY

In theaters throughout the country the movie called 2016 is playing to both small and large audiences with similar reviews. It is a documentary that answers the enigmatic questions as to what motivates President Obama’s mindset when he seems to continually choose policies that hurt rather than help the country.

Filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza lays out a straightforward case by using Obama’s own words, affiliations and actions to leave little doubt about our President’s anti-colonial views that echo the preachment of Reverend Wright a la “Goddamn America”.

We know that many liberals in the Democratic Party have a “blame America first” mindset but Obama’s intent is not just to shame the United States about its unflattering past history but to literally downgrade America from a super power nation to a third rate country in the world.

This movie is a cliff note encapsulation of facts that most political knowledgeable conservatives already knew and an eye-opening horror film to those Americans who have not been paying attention. The president has a deep rooted antipathy toward America and believes our colonial exploits should be rewarded by destroying our standing and strength in the new world order.

His thought to be off microphone comment to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in which he said “This is my last election…After my election I have more flexibility” was a curious and foretelling whisper that angered all those that believe in a transparent White House.

He was talking about America’s nuclear missile defenses and lest we forget about Obama making the outrageous statement back in April of 2010 when Obama declared that the United States would not use nuclear weapons even in self defense. D’Souza explains in the movie that Obama’s goal is to bring the United States arms supremacy to a decidedly underdog’s handicapping to both the Russians and just about every other missile laden country in the world.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/04/05/obama-limit-potential-uses-nuclear-weapons/

The effectiveness of Obama’s policies to downgrade America’s strength and influence in the world has been most notably achieved in raising the national debt that then is bought by China, Japan and to a lesser degree Russia, Brazil, Taiwan and Canada. Thought of in a simple way, if you owe money to the neighbor that lives to the right of your house and you are angry with the neighbor that lives to the left of your house but those two neighbors are in alliance, then what? If you try and make hay with the neighbor on your left the other neighbor calls in your loan. 

Our lack of fiscal strength domestically lessens our foreign policy strength and influence across the globe and Obama finds that a fitting downgrade for what he sees as an arrogant colonial America that now needs to take a back seat in the world.

It is why his foreign policy trips have been so apologetic and to most Americans pathetic. The latest evidence of Obama’s lack of American patriotism can be shown by Obama’s cowering response over the Libyan embassy terror attack. It has been treated as an unknown grassroots Libyan mob uprising rather than a planned Al-Qaeda attack to memorialize 911. Worse there is new evidence that points to the failure of the Obama administration to heed the warning by the now dead ambassador (Christopher Stevens) for greater security protection.

Obama and Reverend Wright are not standing side by side for photographs since he has taken office but their political views are as married and marred in similar anti-Americanism nonetheless. Obama does not believe in American exceptional-ism but rather only in his narcissistic exceptional-ism. 

2016 is a movie that explains Obama’s ultimate objectives. He is not just a radical left-wing Marxist’s socialist wishing as most left-wing liberals wish, to turn America into a socialist’s state, re-write our Constitution and detach our cultural Judea-Christian roots for a humanistic atheism but he view is more radical than that. Indeed far scarier than that. 

Obama has a deep seeded antipathy for all nations that employed colonialism having a sophomoric belief that the western countries of the world raped, pillaged and purposely generated poverty and despair in all the third world countries for two centuries. 

The movie also shows that Obama was highly influenced in his world views by Frank Marshal Davis a communist poet and an adopted uncle into his maternal family home. Davis had an equally antagonistic view of all things associated with capitalism in the western world believing socialism would work if not foiled by western dominance and colonialism.

Any American that has heard the president claim he cares about the middle class, the jobless rate, the high energy prices and the increase of welfare dependency under his stewardship while they equally read about his denial of Keystone, oil drilling leases, taxpayer give-a-ways to failed green energy companies and Food Stamp advertisements across the Mexican border should wake up.

This President wants America and Americans to feel pain. This President wants America and Americans to go to the back of the line in humble contrition for past affluence gained on the backs of the third world countries in his absurd belief of colonial theft. This President will continue his agenda to weaken our country at home and abroad if given another four years to force flagellating policies before he, Michelle and his minority of radicals are satisfied that America has diminished enough to pay for her past sins.

 

No American can watch 2016 and not see the real agenda of Barack Obama.

No American can watch 2016 and want to Obama another four years in office.

No American can watch 2016 and claim it is anything more than a logical explanation between both the president’s own candid statements and his policy actions regardless of his teleprompter rhetoric when he gets caught under the fire of dissent.

Don’t be afraid to watch the truth of 2016 and understand that this professor President’s ineptness is as cynical as your professor of business that teaches you to run a business he never owned and operated. 

Watch the movie 2016 and know exactly who you are putting in charge for another term and if you care about your country you will not give him that "flexibility" to damage America further.